Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Management control systems and strategy: A critical review
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Langfield‐Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Langfield‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Langfield‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Langfield‐Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Langfield‐Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Langfield‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Langfield‐Smith. The network helps show where Kim Langfield‐Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Langfield‐Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Langfield‐Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Langfield‐Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Langfield‐Smith. Kim Langfield‐Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Langfield‐Smith, Kim, et al.. (2009). Management accounting : information for creating and managing value. McGraw-Hill eBooks.65 indexed citations
Bhimani, Alnoor & Kim Langfield‐Smith. (2006). Structure, Formality and the Importance of Financial and Non-Financial Information in Strategy Development and Implementation. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).5 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Susan P., Steve Elliot, Kim Langfield‐Smith, & Catherine Hardy. (2006). Report on the Findings of the 2004 Australian National eProcurement Survey. The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney).2 indexed citations
Langfield‐Smith, Kim, et al.. (2004). Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: critical analysis and opportunities. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).141 indexed citations
9.
Choe, Jong-Min & Kim Langfield‐Smith. (2004). The Effects of National Culture on the Design of Management Accounting Information Systems. 7(1). 3–24.7 indexed citations
10.
Langfield‐Smith, Kim & David A. Smith. (2003). Management Control Systems and Trust in Outsourcing Relationships. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Langan‐Fox, Janice, Anthony Wirth, Sharon Code, Kim Langfield‐Smith, & Andrew Wirth. (2000). Analyzing Shared Mental Models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 44(1). 57–60.3 indexed citations
15.
Chenhall, Robert H. & Kim Langfield‐Smith. (1999). Innovations in Management Accounting. 69(8). 76–78.
16.
Chenhall, Robert H. & Kim Langfield‐Smith. (1998). Factors Influencing the Role of Management Accounting in the Development of Performance Measures within Organizational Change Programs. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
17.
Chenhall, Robert H. & Kim Langfield‐Smith. (1998). Adoption and Benefits of Management Accounting Practices: An Australian Study. SSRN Electronic Journal.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.