Language Assessment Quarterly

498 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 498 papers published in Language Assessment Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Language Assessment Quarterly usually cover Language and Linguistics (238 papers), Education (192 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (173 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (229 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (146 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Language Assessment Quarterly are Glenn Fulcher, Bruno D. Zumbo, Suresh Canagarajah, Thomas Eckes, Lyle F. Bachman, Tim McNamara, Jan H. Hulstijn, Yasuyo Sawaki, Evelina D. Galaczi and Constant Leung.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Language Assessment Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Language Assessment Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Language Assessment Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Language Assessment Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Language Assessment Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Language Assessment Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Language Assessment Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025