Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
20011.2k citationsRobert DeKeyser, Jan H. Hulstijn et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Incidental Vocabulary Learning by Advanced Foreign Language Students: The Influence of Marginal Glosses, Dictionary Use, and Reoccurrence of Unknown Words
1996501 citationsJan H. Hulstijn et al.Modern Language Journalprofile →
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages
Countries citing papers authored by Jan H. Hulstijn
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan H. Hulstijn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan H. Hulstijn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan H. Hulstijn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan H. Hulstijn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan H. Hulstijn. The network helps show where Jan H. Hulstijn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan H. Hulstijn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan H. Hulstijn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan H. Hulstijn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan H. Hulstijn. Jan H. Hulstijn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hulstijn, Jan H., et al.. (1998). Dialogue strategy redesign with reability measures. Language Resources and Evaluation. 30(3). 191–198.4 indexed citations
12.
Hulstijn, Jan H. & Robert DeKeyser. (1997). Testing SLA theory in the research lab. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.7 indexed citations
13.
Coady, James, James Coady, Michael H. Long, et al.. (1996). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge University Press eBooks.335 indexed citations
14.
Hulstijn, Jan H.. (1995). Not all grammar rules are equal: giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).31 indexed citations
15.
Hulstijn, Jan H. & Rick de Graaff. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review. 11. 97–112.132 indexed citations
Hulstijn, Jan H., et al.. (1992). Woorden op zicht. Woordselectie ten behoeve van het NT2-onderwijs. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 467(467). 2–7.1 indexed citations
18.
Hulstijn, Jan H., et al.. (1991). Reading in two languages. AILA Review.19 indexed citations
19.
Hulstijn, Jan H.. (1991). How is reading in a second language related to reading in a first language. AILA Review. 8. 5–14.8 indexed citations
20.
Hulstijn, Jan H.. (1979). Variabiliteit in Tussentaal. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen. 7. 141–155.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.