Journal of Industrial Relations

1.8k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Journal of Industrial Relations in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Industrial Relations usually cover Public Administration (1.1k papers), Sociology and Political Science (484 papers) and General Health Professions (418 papers) specifically the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (1.1k papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (410 papers) and Digital Economy and Work Transformation (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Industrial Relations are David Guest, Braham Dabscheck, David Peetz, Rae Cooper, Mark Wooden, Sarah Kaine, David Metcalf, Barbara Pocock, Raewyn Connell and Ian Watson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Industrial Relations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Industrial Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Industrial Relations.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Industrial Relations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Industrial Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Industrial Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Industrial Relations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025