Michele Ford

2.2k citations
88 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michele Ford

80 papers receiving 878 citations

Peers

Michele Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Public Administration 277
  • Political Science and International Relations 416
  • Sociology and Political Science 665
  • Strategy and Management 134
  • Demography 68
Replace Geert De Neve with:
Geert De Neve United Kingdom
Rick Fantasia United States
Alessandra Mezzadri United Kingdom
Gay W. Seidman United States
James DeFilippis United States
Ludger Pries Germany
Per Selle Norway
Harry W. Arthurs Canada
Kevin Hewison United States
Adalbert Evers Germany
Michele Ford relative to Geert De Neve United Kingdom Geert De Neve's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Geert De Neve · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michele Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michele Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michele Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michele Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michele Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michele Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michele Ford. The network helps show where Michele Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michele Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michele Ford Line = papers co-authored together Michele Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20242
4 20240
5 20231
6 20232
7 20234
8 20224
9 20223
10 202117
11 20211
12 20219
13 20213
14 20200
15 20206
16 202015
17 20191
18 20181
19 20069
20
Review of The Institutions of Modernism: Literary Elites and Public Culture by Lawrence Rainey
19990

About Michele Ford

Michele Ford is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (33 papers), Asian Studies and History (19 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (15 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (11 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (10 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (277 citations), Political Science and International Relations (416 citations), Sociology and Political Science (665 citations), Strategy and Management (134 citations) and Demography (68 citations). Michele Ford has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Gillan, Lenore Lyons, Lyn Parker, Thomas B. Pepinsky, Teri L. Caraway, Kumiko Kawashima, Robert Cribb, Htwe Htwe Thein, Sophie Williams and Willem van Schendel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Asian and Pacific migration journal, Indonesia and Contemporary Southeast Asia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026