Industrial Relations Journal

1.4k papers and 16.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Industrial Relations Journal in the last decades have received a total of 16.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Industrial Relations Journal usually cover Public Administration (931 papers), Political Science and International Relations (493 papers) and General Health Professions (396 papers) specifically the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (925 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (383 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (339 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Industrial Relations Journal are Phil Taylor, Edmund Heery, Peter Bain, Peter Nolan, Jill Rubery, Jeremy Waddington, Paul Edwards, Cynthia Cockburn, Peter Ackers and Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Industrial Relations Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Industrial Relations Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Industrial Relations Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Industrial Relations Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Industrial Relations Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Industrial Relations Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Industrial Relations Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025