Journal of Labor Research

1.2k papers and 14.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Labor Research in the last decades have received a total of 14.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Labor Research usually cover Economics and Econometrics (546 papers), Public Administration (515 papers) and General Health Professions (232 papers) specifically the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (514 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (319 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Labor Research are Barry T. Hirsch, Bruce E. Kaufman, John T. Addison, William J. Moore, I. M. Jawahar, Jack Fiorito, Greg Hundley, Anthony R. Hendrickson, Gary N. Chaison and James T. Bennett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Labor Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Labor Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Labor Research.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Labor Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Labor Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Labor Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Labor Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025