Countries where authors publish in Policy & Politics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Policy & Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Policy & Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Policy & Politics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Policy & Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Policy & Politics.
About Policy & Politics
The 1.4k papers published in Policy & Politics in the last decades have received a total of 25.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Policy & Politics usually cover Public Administration (241 papers), Political Science and International Relations (592 papers) and Finance (193 papers) specifically the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (246 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (181 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (153 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (126 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (125 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (94 papers), Political Systems and Governance (63 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Policy & Politics are Wim van Oorschot, Giuliano Bonoli, Anthony Giddens, Michael Howlett, Jon Pierre, Paul Cairney, B. Guy Peters, Christopher Pollitt, Claire A. Dunlop and Diane Stone.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.