History of Education Review

251 papers and 631 indexed citations i.

About

The 251 papers published in History of Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 631 indexed citations. Papers published in History of Education Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (146 papers), Education (141 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (37 papers) specifically the topics of Australian History and Society (76 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (69 papers) and Historical Education Studies Worldwide (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Education Review are Julie McLeod, Tamson Pietsch, Raewyn Connell, Barry Down, Katie Wright, Mary O’Dowd, Bernadette Baker, Nicole Mockler, Tony Dowden and Josep M. Comelles.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Education Review.

Countries where authors publish in History of Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Education Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025