Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Raewyn Connell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Raewyn Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raewyn Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raewyn Connell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raewyn Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raewyn Connell. The network helps show where Raewyn Connell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raewyn Connell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raewyn Connell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raewyn Connell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Raewyn Connell. Raewyn Connell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Connell, Raewyn. (2016). What are good universities. Australian universities' review. 58(2). 67–73.11 indexed citations
6.
Connell, Raewyn. (2015). Gender and embodiment in world society. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 3(1). 289–295.1 indexed citations
7.
Connell, Raewyn. (2015). The knowledge economy and university workers. Australian universities' review. 57(2). 91–95.15 indexed citations
Connell, Raewyn. (2014). Love, fear and learning in the market university. Australian universities' review. 56(2). 56.7 indexed citations
10.
Connell, Raewyn. (2014). Rethinking Gender Theory in World Perspective. XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 13-19, 2014).1 indexed citations
11.
Connell, Raewyn. (2013). Gender, power and knowledge in global perspective.. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).
12.
Connell, Raewyn & Catherine Manathunga. (2012). On doctoral education: How to supervise a PhD, 1985-2011. Australian universities' review. 54(1). 5–9.22 indexed citations
13.
Connell, Raewyn. (2006). Conocimiento indígena y poder global: lecciones de los debates africanos. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
14.
Connell, Raewyn. (2001). EDUCANDO A LOS MUCHACHOS: NUEVAS INVESTIGACIONES SOBRE MASCULINIDAD Y ESTRATEGIAS DE GÉNERO PARA LAS ESCUELAS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.13 indexed citations
Connell, Raewyn. (1998). Introduction, studying Australian masculinities. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia). 3(2). 1.12 indexed citations
17.
Connell, Raewyn. (1997). Men, masculinities and feminism. Social alternatives. 16(3). 7.21 indexed citations
18.
Connell, Raewyn. (1996). Politics of changing men. 53.17 indexed citations
19.
Connell, Raewyn. (1990). Como teorizar o patriarcado. Educação & Realidade. 15(2). 85–93.4 indexed citations
20.
Connell, Raewyn. (1985). How to Supervise a Ph.D.. 28(2). 38–42.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.