Franciscan studies

515 papers and 753 indexed citations i.

About

The 515 papers published in Franciscan studies in the last decades have received a total of 753 indexed citations. Papers published in Franciscan studies usually cover Philosophy (264 papers), Classics (207 papers) and History (173 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Philosophy and Theology (196 papers), Medieval Literature and History (172 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Franciscan studies are Marilyn McCord Adams, Gedeon Gál, A. N. Prior, Rega Wood, John Boler, Robert J. Karris, Siegfried Wenzel, Paul Vincent Spade, E. J. Ashworth and Bert Roest.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Franciscan studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Franciscan studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Franciscan studies.

Countries where authors publish in Franciscan studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Franciscan studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Franciscan studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franciscan studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025