Measuring Business Excellence

765 papers and 14.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 765 papers published in Measuring Business Excellence in the last decades have received a total of 14.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Measuring Business Excellence usually cover Strategy and Management (344 papers), Management Information Systems (287 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (138 papers) specifically the topics of Quality and Supply Management (165 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (140 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Measuring Business Excellence are Michael E. Porter, John Elkington, Ante Pulić, Peter M. Senge, Andy Neely, K. Narasimhan, Jiju Antony, Ricardo Bañuelas, Chris Adams and Mike Bourne.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Measuring Business Excellence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Measuring Business Excellence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Measuring Business Excellence.

Countries where authors publish in Measuring Business Excellence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Measuring Business Excellence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Measuring Business Excellence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measuring Business Excellence more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025