European Management Review

687 papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 687 papers published in European Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in European Management Review usually cover Strategy and Management (310 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (291 papers) and Accounting (144 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (195 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (131 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Management Review are Jean‐Claude Usunier, Henk Volberda, Steven Klepper, Morten Huse, Alfonso Gambardella, Sabina Nielsen, Dietmar Harhoff, Bart Verspagen, Bruno S. Frey and Robert Chia.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in European Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025