Strategic Change

1.2k papers and 12.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Strategic Change in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Strategic Change usually cover Strategy and Management (466 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (251 papers) and Accounting (236 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (239 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (148 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strategic Change are James Richardson, Arvind Ashta, Graham Beaver, Glenn Parry, Tony Grundy, David Hussey, Gareth White, Stephanie Macht, Delwyn Clark and Tom Connor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Strategic Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Strategic Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strategic Change.

Countries where authors publish in Strategic Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strategic Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strategic Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strategic Change more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025