Gifted Child Today

956 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 956 papers published in Gifted Child Today in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Gifted Child Today usually cover Education (382 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (340 papers) and Safety Research (120 papers) specifically the topics of Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (283 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (74 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gifted Child Today are Del Siegle, Donna Y. Ford, Tracy L. Cross, Jennifer L. Jolly, Joyce VanTassel‐Baska, Susan K. Johnsen, Paula Olszewski‐Kubilius, Sally M. Reis, Sandra N. Kaplan and Mary Ruth Coleman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Gifted Child Today

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Gifted Child Today. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gifted Child Today.

Countries where authors publish in Gifted Child Today

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gifted Child Today. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gifted Child Today with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gifted Child Today more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025