Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery ResearchIran
Japan Journal of Nursing ScienceJapan
Nursing Research and PracticeUnited States
The Health Care ManagerUnited States
Australian journal of advanced nursingAustralia
Asian Nursing ResearchSouth Korea
Journal of Nursing ResearchTaiwan
JBI Evidence SynthesisAustralia
Journal of Nursing MeasurementUnited States
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciencesrelative toSAGE Open NursingUnited StatesSAGE Open Nursing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17×
SAGE Open Nursing · 1×
×0.9392/445RT
×1.0168/168IELA
×0.7147/217LM
×1.5534/366EMS
×1.1366/333RUT
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences.
About International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.