English Teaching Practice & Critique

425 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 425 papers published in English Teaching Practice & Critique in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in English Teaching Practice & Critique usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (176 papers), Education (168 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (105 papers) specifically the topics of Literacy, Media, and Education (121 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (82 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in English Teaching Practice & Critique are Mike Metz, Susanne Gannon, Mark Feng Teng, Sung‐Yeon Kim, Karim Sadeghi, Jory Brass, Wei Liu, Jack C. Richards, Paul Nation and Andrew Goodwyn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in English Teaching Practice & Critique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in English Teaching Practice & Critique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in English Teaching Practice & Critique.

Countries where authors publish in English Teaching Practice & Critique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in English Teaching Practice & Critique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in English Teaching Practice & Critique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites English Teaching Practice & Critique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025