Equal Opportunities International

607 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 607 papers published in Equal Opportunities International in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Equal Opportunities International usually cover Gender Studies (242 papers), Sociology and Political Science (177 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (88 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Diversity and Inequality (184 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (76 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Equal Opportunities International are Bruno Latour, Ronald J. Burke, Brian H. Kleiner, Ahu Tatlι, Glenice J. Wood, Lisa Fiksenbaum, Mustafa Koyuncu, Paula Brough, Thomas Kalliath and Nicki Ward.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Equal Opportunities International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Equal Opportunities International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Equal Opportunities International.

Countries where authors publish in Equal Opportunities International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Equal Opportunities International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Equal Opportunities International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Equal Opportunities International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025