Educational Theory

2.1k papers and 17.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Educational Theory in the last decades have received a total of 17.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Theory usually cover Education (1.2k papers), Philosophy (772 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (431 papers) specifically the topics of Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (546 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (395 papers) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (288 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Theory are Gert Biesta, Michalinos Zembylas, Andrew Ortony, Deborah P. Britzman, Nicholas C. Burbules, Henry A. Giroux, Patti Lather, Roger Dale, Michael W. Apple and Ilan Gur-Ze’ev.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025