Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Effects of Firm-Wide and Office-Level Industry Expertise on Audit Pricing
2003567 citationsAndrew Ferguson, Jere R. Francis et al.The Accounting Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Donald J. Stokes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald J. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald J. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald J. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald J. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald J. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald J. Stokes. The network helps show where Donald J. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald J. Stokes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald J. Stokes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald J. Stokes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donald J. Stokes. Donald J. Stokes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stokes, Donald J.. (2013). GENERATING INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IDEAS. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems. 12(2). 144–154.6 indexed citations
Cotter, Julie, Donald J. Stokes, & Anne Wyatt. (2010). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Asset Writedowns. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
6.
Vergauwe, Skrålan, Ann Gaeremynck, & Donald J. Stokes. (2010). The impact of disclosure and audit effort on the reliability of fair value estimates in the real estate industry.1 indexed citations
Stokes, Donald J., et al.. (2009). Audit quality, earnings quality and the cost of equity capital. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).5 indexed citations
9.
Stewart, Richard B., et al.. (2004). Understanding the options in strategic decisions and investments. 2–5.1 indexed citations
10.
Ferguson, Andrew, Jere R. Francis, & Donald J. Stokes. (2003). The Effects of Firm-Wide and Office-Level Industry Expertise on Audit Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal.50 indexed citations
11.
Ferguson, Andrew, Jere R. Francis, & Donald J. Stokes. (2003). The Effects of Firm-Wide and Office-Level Industry Expertise on Audit Pricing. The Accounting Review. 78(2). 429–448.567 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Craswell, Allen, et al.. (2002). Auditor Independence and Fee Dependence. SSRN Electronic Journal.30 indexed citations
Matolcsy, Zoltan, Donald J. Stokes, & Peter Wells. (2002). Valuing intangible assets provides new challenges. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).2 indexed citations
Francis, Jere R., Donald J. Stokes, & Don Anderson. (1999). City Markets as a Unit of Analysis in Audit Research and the Re-examination of Big 6 Market Shares. SSRN Electronic Journal.16 indexed citations
Anderson, Donald L., Donald J. Stokes, & Ian Zimmer. (1989). Corporate takeovers and auditor switching. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.