Zafar Iqbal

651 total citations
9 papers, 507 citations indexed

About

Zafar Iqbal is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Zafar Iqbal has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 507 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 3 papers in Strategy and Management and 3 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Zafar Iqbal's work include Management and Marketing Education (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers). Zafar Iqbal is often cited by papers focused on Management and Marketing Education (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers). Zafar Iqbal collaborates with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Kazakhstan. Zafar Iqbal's co-authors include Rajesh Sethi, Rohit Verma, Xin Ding, Nina Diamond, Stephen K. Koernig, Lawrence Feick and Rahim Khan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marketing, Journal of Service Research and International Journal of Service Industry Management.

In The Last Decade

Zafar Iqbal

8 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Zafar Iqbal United States	6	214	161	147	117	102	9	507
Michel van der Borgh Netherlands	13	238 1.1×	166 1.0×	194 1.3×	129 1.1×	64 0.6×	21	564
Nicolas Zacharias Germany	12	324 1.5×	189 1.2×	209 1.4×	156 1.3×	59 0.6×	25	700
Nima Heirati United Kingdom	13	269 1.3×	203 1.3×	180 1.2×	88 0.8×	47 0.5×	22	531
Michael Obal United States	14	250 1.2×	189 1.2×	129 0.9×	76 0.6×	120 1.2×	24	631
Ajax Persaud Canada	10	203 0.9×	198 1.2×	105 0.7×	126 1.1×	165 1.6×	28	679
Lisa Song United States	9	305 1.4×	129 0.8×	138 0.9×	154 1.3×	50 0.5×	18	572
Nina Helander Finland	14	254 1.2×	145 0.9×	124 0.8×	109 0.9×	51 0.5×	64	661
Anthony W. Ulwick Russia	6	199 0.9×	234 1.5×	118 0.8×	172 1.5×	38 0.4×	8	595
Boyoung Kim South Korea	14	114 0.5×	141 0.9×	94 0.6×	117 1.0×	86 0.8×	69	604
Ronny Reinhardt Germany	11	216 1.0×	130 0.8×	61 0.4×	83 0.7×	99 1.0×	20	540

Countries citing papers authored by Zafar Iqbal

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zafar Iqbal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zafar Iqbal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zafar Iqbal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zafar Iqbal

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zafar Iqbal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zafar Iqbal. The network helps show where Zafar Iqbal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zafar Iqbal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zafar Iqbal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zafar Iqbal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zafar Iqbal. Zafar Iqbal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Iqbal, Zafar. (2023). MARKETING CURRICULUM DESIGN AND CAREER OUTCOMES. Marketing Education Review. 33(3). 242–260. 4 indexed citations

2.

Iqbal, Zafar, et al.. (2022). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model. VII(II). 285–295. 1 indexed citations

3.

Iqbal, Zafar. (2019). Eastern Promises Fulfilled: The Differential Impact of Marketing-Focused Short-Term Study Abroad Programs in India and Japan. Frontiers The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. 31(2). 158–179. 6 indexed citations

4.

Sethi, Rajesh, et al.. (2011). Developing New-to-the-Firm Products: The Role of Micropolitical Strategies. Journal of Marketing. 76(2). 99–115. 52 indexed citations

5.

Sethi, Rajesh & Zafar Iqbal. (2008). Stage-Gate Controls, Learning Failure, and Adverse Effect on Novel New Products. Journal of Marketing. 72(1). 118–134. 219 indexed citations

6.

Diamond, Nina, Stephen K. Koernig, & Zafar Iqbal. (2008). Uniting Active and Deep Learning to Teach Problem-Solving Skills. Journal of Marketing Education. 30(2). 116–129. 46 indexed citations

7.

Ding, Xin, Rohit Verma, & Zafar Iqbal. (2007). Self‐service technology and online financial service choice. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 18(3). 246–268. 112 indexed citations

8.

Iqbal, Zafar, et al.. (2003). Understanding Consumer Choices and Preferences in Transaction-Based e-Services. Journal of Service Research. 6(1). 51–65. 62 indexed citations

9.

Iqbal, Zafar & Lawrence Feick. (2002). Sales Managers' Perceptions of Gray Markets: The Role of Incentives, Channel Dependence, and Type of Gray Market. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 22(4). 273–283. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact