Yellowlees Douglas

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Yellowlees Douglas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Yellowlees Douglas has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Yellowlees Douglas's work include Text Readability and Simplification (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper) and Academic Writing and Publishing (1 paper). Yellowlees Douglas is often cited by papers focused on Text Readability and Simplification (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper) and Academic Writing and Publishing (1 paper). Yellowlees Douglas collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Yellowlees Douglas's co-authors include Andrew Hargadon, Kaj Grønbæk, Hugh Davis, Maria B. Grant and Maria B. Grant and has published in prestigious journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, Medical Hypotheses and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Yellowlees Douglas

13 papers receiving 995 citations

Hit Papers

When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 250 500 750

Peers

Yellowlees Douglas
Muammer Ozer Hong Kong
Jonathan Moizer United Kingdom
E.C. Martins South Africa
Fransie Terblanche South Africa
Barbara Jaworski United Kingdom
Salvatore Parise United States
Yellowlees Douglas
Citations per year, relative to Yellowlees Douglas Yellowlees Douglas (= 1×) peers Κωνσταντίνος Κωστόπουλος

Countries citing papers authored by Yellowlees Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yellowlees Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yellowlees Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yellowlees Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yellowlees Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yellowlees Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yellowlees Douglas. The network helps show where Yellowlees Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yellowlees Douglas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yellowlees Douglas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yellowlees Douglas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yellowlees Douglas. Yellowlees Douglas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Douglas, Yellowlees & Maria B. Grant. (2018). The Biomedical Writer: What You Need to Succeed in Academic Medicine. 1 indexed citations
2.
Douglas, Yellowlees. (2017). Do Paradoxes Prompt Better Attention and Recall? Implications for Publishing and Disseminating Academic Research. International Journal of Business Administration. 8(3). 45–45. 1 indexed citations
3.
Douglas, Yellowlees. (2016). Top-Down Research, Generalists, and Google Scholar: Does Google Scholar Facilitate Breakthrough Research?. OALib. 3(5). 1–8. 2 indexed citations
4.
Douglas, Yellowlees. (2016). The real malady of Marcel Proust and what it reveals about diagnostic errors in medicine. Medical Hypotheses. 90. 14–18. 1 indexed citations
5.
Douglas, Yellowlees, et al.. (2016). Syntactic Complexity of Reading Content Directly Impacts Complexity of Mature Students’ Writing. International Journal of Business Administration. 7(3). 6 indexed citations
6.
Douglas, Yellowlees, et al.. (2016). Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of Reading Correlates with Complexity of Writing in Adults. International Journal of Business Administration. 7(4). 6 indexed citations
7.
Douglas, Yellowlees & Maria B. Grant. (2016). Minocycline Attenuates Severe Hyperglycemia in Patient with Lipodystrophy. 3(1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Douglas, Yellowlees, et al.. (2015). Availability Bias Can Improve Women’s Propensity to Negotiate. International Journal of Business Administration. 6(2). 6 indexed citations
9.
Douglas, Yellowlees. (2015). The Reader's Brain. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
10.
Davis, Hugh, et al.. (2001). Hypertext 2001. Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. 1 indexed citations
11.
Grønbæk, Kaj, Hugh Davis, & Yellowlees Douglas. (2001). Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM Conference on Hypertext. 30 indexed citations
12.
Hargadon, Andrew & Yellowlees Douglas. (2001). When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light. Administrative Science Quarterly. 46(3). 476–501. 939 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Douglas, Yellowlees & Andrew Hargadon. (2000). The pleasure principle. 153–160. 113 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026