Xiaojing Weng
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Education top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas K. F. ChiuOi‐Lam NgQi XiaTzung‐Jin LinFan OuyangMorris Siu–Yung JongGary K. W. WongYun Dai
- Topics
- Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers)Teaching and Learning Programming (7 papers)Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Xiaojing Weng
21 papers receiving 372 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Computer Science Applications 145
- Education 121
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 92
- Artificial Intelligence 66
- Information Systems 65
Countries citing papers authored by Xiaojing Weng
This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaojing Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaojing Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaojing Weng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaojing Weng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaojing Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaojing Weng. The network helps show where Xiaojing Weng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xiaojing Weng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xiaojing Weng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xiaojing Weng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xiaojing Weng. Xiaojing Weng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher educationbreakdown → | 86 |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | Instructional design and learning outcomes of intelligent computer assisted language learning: Systematic review in the fieldbreakdown → | 58 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 64 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Xiaojing Weng
Xiaojing Weng is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Health Informatics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (7 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (145 citations), Health Informatics (35 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (92 citations). Xiaojing Weng has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas K. F. Chiu, Oi‐Lam Ng, Qi Xia, Tzung‐Jin Lin, Fan Ouyang, Morris Siu–Yung Jong, Gary K. W. Wong, Yun Dai, Huiyan Ye and Mingyue Gu. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Educational Computing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.