William Schweiker
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- C. Edward ArringtonEdward A. FoxJohn L. EatonGail McMillanNeill A. KippPaul M. MatherNigel BiggarJoshua Mitchell
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (11 papers)Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (8 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers)
- Journals
- Accounting Organizations and SocietyAcademic MedicineJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
William Schweiker
33 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 132
- Management Information Systems 121
- Accounting 96
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 75
- Philosophy 59
Countries citing papers authored by William Schweiker
This map shows the geographic impact of William Schweiker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Schweiker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Schweiker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Schweiker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Schweiker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Schweiker. The network helps show where William Schweiker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Schweiker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Schweiker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Schweiker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Schweiker. William Schweiker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Consistency and Christian Ethics | 1 |
| 8 | Having : property and possession in religious and social life | 3 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Power, Value, and Conviction: Theological Ethics in the Postmodern Age | 11 |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Research Findings on Awareness, Acceptance, and Practice of Emergent Literacy Theory. | 0 |
| 15 | 152 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 96 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About William Schweiker
William Schweiker is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (11 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (8 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (121 citations), Accounting (96 citations) and Religious studies (37 citations). William Schweiker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. Edward Arrington, Edward A. Fox, John L. Eaton, Gail McMillan, Neill A. Kipp, Paul M. Mather, Nigel Biggar, Joshua Mitchell, Robin W. Lovin and Fred Dallmayr. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Academic Medicine and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.