C. Edward Arrington

22 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

C. Edward Arrington
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Management Information Systems 449
  • Accounting 393
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 190
  • Strategy and Management 127
  • Sociology and Political Science 98
Replace Juliana Ng with:
Juliana Ng Australia
E. A. Lowe United Kingdom
Utz Schäffer Germany
Henri Guénin-Paracini Canada
Chong M. Lau Australia
Carolyn Stringer New Zealand
Richard Fisher New Zealand
Peter Moizer United Kingdom
Jan Bouwens Netherlands
Isabella Grabner Austria
C. Edward Arrington relative to Juliana Ng Australia Juliana Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Juliana Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Edward Arrington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Edward Arrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Edward Arrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Edward Arrington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Edward Arrington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Edward Arrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Edward Arrington. The network helps show where C. Edward Arrington may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Edward Arrington

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Edward Arrington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Edward Arrington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Edward Arrington. C. Edward Arrington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 20
2
Race matters: whether we know it, or like it, or not: implicit racial attitudes and their effect on accounting-based, balanced scorecard performance evaluations
1
3 1
4
Globalization, management control and ideology
3
5
Late-modern politics and the ubiquity of accounting: the expansion of new public management within the US public sector
1
6 53
7 22
8 18
9 18
10 60
11 96
12 99
13 177
14 5
15 33
16 36
17 32
18 7
19 20
20 11

About C. Edward Arrington

C. Edward Arrington is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Information Systems and Accounting, having authored 22 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (12 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (449 citations), Accounting (393 citations) and Public Administration (80 citations). C. Edward Arrington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jere R. Francis, Anthony G. Puxty, William Schweiker, Teri Shearer, Philip M.J. Reckers, Robert E. Jensen, William Hillison, David Upton, Charles D. Bailey and William S. Hopwood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, Accounting Organizations and Society and Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026