William R. Newman
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- History top 2%
- Archeology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Lawrence M. PrincipeJohn MurdochChristoph LüthyAntonio ClericuzioCristina VianoAnthony GraftonRichard B. KennedySeymour H. Mauskopf
- Topics
- History of Science and Medicine (15 papers)Historical Philosophy and Science (13 papers)Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Historical ReviewJournal of the American Oriental Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
William R. Newman
40 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- History and Philosophy of Science 279
- Philosophy 91
- Anthropology 87
- History 70
- Archeology 59
Countries citing papers authored by William R. Newman
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Newman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Newman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Newman. The network helps show where William R. Newman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Newman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Newman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Newman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Newman. William R. Newman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Chemical knowledge in the early modern world | 2 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Evidence and interpretation in studies on early science and medicine : essays in honor of John E. Murdoch | 2 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Alchemy tried in the fire : Starkey, Boyle, and the fate of Helmontian chemistry | 3 |
| 15 | Secrets of Nature. Astrology and Alchemy in Early Modern Europe | 1 |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About William R. Newman
William R. Newman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (15 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (13 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (279 citations), Anthropology (87 citations) and Philosophy (91 citations). William R. Newman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence M. Principe, John Murdoch, Christoph Lüthy, Antonio Clericuzio, Cristina Viano, Anthony Grafton, Richard B. Kennedy, Seymour H. Mauskopf, Bruce Pourciau and George Smith. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.