Rob Iliffe

638 citations
16 papers · 135 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Rob Iliffe

14 papers receiving 102 citations

Peers

Rob Iliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • History and Philosophy of Science 87
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
  • Anthropology 36
  • Philosophy 21
  • History 17
Replace Stephen Clucas with:
Stephen Clucas United Kingdom
Scott Mandelbrote United Kingdom
Miguel Á. Granada Spain
James E. Force United States
L. W. B. Brockliss United Kingdom
Antonio Clericuzio Italy
André Goddu United States
Edith Dudley Sylla United States
Lesley B. Cormack Canada
Graham Rees United Kingdom
Rob Iliffe relative to Stephen Clucas United Kingdom Stephen Clucas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Stephen Clucas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Iliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Iliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Iliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Iliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Iliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Iliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Iliffe. The network helps show where Rob Iliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Rob Iliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rob Iliffe Line = papers co-authored together Rob Iliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199526
2 199226
3 200418
4 201610
5 19989
6 19958
7
Newton: A Very Short Introduction
20078
8 19938
9 20007
10 20076
11 20083
12 19932
13 20152
14 20151
15 19951
16 20070

About Rob Iliffe

Rob Iliffe is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Anthropology, History and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 16 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (3 papers), Historical Geography and Cartography (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (87 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations), Anthropology (36 citations), Philosophy (21 citations) and History (17 citations). Rob Iliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Niccolò Guicciardini, William R. Newman, Domenico Bertoloni Meli, George Smith, Alan Gabbey, Scott Mandelbrote, Trevor H. Levere, Alan E. Shapiro, Howard Stein and Curtis Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as History of Science, Annals of Science, The British Journal for the History of Science, Histoire & Mesure and Medical History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact