John Hedley Brooke

1.2k total citations
62 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

John Hedley Brooke is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Hedley Brooke has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 16 papers in Philosophy and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Hedley Brooke's work include Evolution and Science Education (21 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (6 papers). John Hedley Brooke is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Science Education (21 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (6 papers). John Hedley Brooke collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ghana. John Hedley Brooke's co-authors include Lewis Namier, Margaret J. Osler, Geoffrey Cantor, David C. Lindberg, Jonathan R. Topham, R. Hooykaas, Mikael Stenmark, Peter Harrison, Nancey Murphy and John A. Henry and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and The American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

John Hedley Brooke

49 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

John Hedley Brooke
B. J. T. Dobbs United States
Allen G. Debus United States
William R. Newman United States
Adriana Craciun United States
Henry Krips Australia
P. M. Rattansi United Kingdom
Ruth Barton New Zealand
B. J. T. Dobbs United States
John Hedley Brooke
Citations per year, relative to John Hedley Brooke John Hedley Brooke (= 1×) peers B. J. T. Dobbs

Countries citing papers authored by John Hedley Brooke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hedley Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hedley Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hedley Brooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hedley Brooke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hedley Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hedley Brooke. The network helps show where John Hedley Brooke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hedley Brooke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hedley Brooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hedley Brooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Hedley Brooke. John Hedley Brooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2024). On the Experience of Being Replicated. Zygon®. 59(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2018). DARWIN AND CHRISTIANITY: TRUTH AND MYTH. Zygon®. 53(3). 1 indexed citations
3.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2016). Ciencia y Religión: : perspectivas históricas. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).
4.
5.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2012). SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY IN THE ENLIGHTENMENT. 29–50.
6.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2012). RECONCILING RELIGIOUS TRADITION AND MODERN SCIENCE. Zygon®. 47(2). 3 indexed citations
7.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2006). “IF I WERE GOD”: EINSTEIN AND RELIGION. Zygon®. 41(4). 1 indexed citations
8.
Brooke, John Hedley, et al.. (2001). Science in Theistic Contexts : Cognitive Dimensions. Osiris. 16. 9 indexed citations
9.
Brooke, John Hedley. (2001). Religious Belief and the Content of the Sciences. Osiris. 16(16). 3–28. 5 indexed citations
10.
Brooke, John Hedley & Geoffrey Cantor. (1998). Reconstructing nature : the engagement of science and religion : Glasgow Gifford lectures. T&T Clark eBooks. 6 indexed citations
11.
Brooke, John Hedley. (1997). Learning disabilities: he's leaving home.. PubMed. 93(34). 34–34. 1 indexed citations
13.
Brooke, John Hedley. (1990). The Galileo affair: teaching AT 17. Physics Education. 25(4). 197–201. 4 indexed citations
14.
Brooke, John Hedley. (1989). Scientific Thought and its Meaning for Religion: The Impact of French Science on British Natural Theology, 1827-1859. Revue de Synthèse. 110(1). 33–59. 3 indexed citations
15.
Brooke, John Hedley. (1989). SCIENCE AND THE SECULARISATION OF KNOWLEDGE: PERSPECTIVES ON SOME EIGHTEENTH CENTURY TRANSFORMATIONS. Nuncius. 4(1). 43–65. 1 indexed citations
16.
Brooke, John Hedley, et al.. (1974). New interactions between theology and natural science. Open University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations
17.
Goodman, David C. & John Hedley Brooke. (1974). Towards a mechanistic philosophy. Open University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
18.
Brooke, John Hedley. (1968). Wöhler's Urea, and its Vital Force ?—A Verdict from the Chemists. Ambix. 15(2). 84–114. 4 indexed citations
19.
Namier, Lewis & John Hedley Brooke. (1964). Charles Townshend. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 6 indexed citations
20.
Ritcheson, Charles R. & John Hedley Brooke. (1958). The Chatham Administration, 1766-1768. The American Historical Review. 63(4). 966–966. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026