John Hedley Brooke
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lewis NamierMargaret J. OslerGeoffrey CantorDavid C. LindbergJonathan R. TophamR. HooykaasMikael StenmarkPeter Harrison
- Topics
- Evolution and Science Education (21 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers)History of Science and Natural History (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGhana
In The Last Decade
John Hedley Brooke
49 papers receiving 247 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- History and Philosophy of Science 137
- Sociology and Political Science 71
- Philosophy 64
- History 40
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 38
Countries citing papers authored by John Hedley Brooke
This map shows the geographic impact of John Hedley Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hedley Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hedley Brooke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Hedley Brooke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hedley Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hedley Brooke. The network helps show where John Hedley Brooke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hedley Brooke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hedley Brooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hedley Brooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Hedley Brooke. John Hedley Brooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Ciencia y Religión: : perspectivas históricas | 0 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Science in Theistic Contexts : Cognitive Dimensions | 9 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | Reconstructing nature : the engagement of science and religion : Glasgow Gifford lectures | 6 |
| 11 | Learning disabilities: he's leaving home. | 1 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | New interactions between theology and natural science | 5 |
| 17 | Towards a mechanistic philosophy | 1 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About John Hedley Brooke
John Hedley Brooke is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Religious studies, having authored 62 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (21 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (137 citations), Philosophy (64 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (38 citations). John Hedley Brooke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Lewis Namier, Margaret J. Osler, Geoffrey Cantor, David C. Lindberg, Jonathan R. Topham, R. Hooykaas, Mikael Stenmark, Peter Harrison, Nancey Murphy and John A. Henry. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.