Christoph Lüthy
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- William R. NewmanJohn MurdochSven DupréCees LeijenhorstHans C. SteinrückenJames AllenThomas HeinisHans Hoeken
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (12 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers)History of Science and Medicine (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Christoph Lüthy
21 papers receiving 153 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- History and Philosophy of Science 95
- Anthropology 39
- History 38
- Philosophy 32
- Sociology and Political Science 17
Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Lüthy
This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Lüthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Lüthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Lüthy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Lüthy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Lüthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Lüthy. The network helps show where Christoph Lüthy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Lüthy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Lüthy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Lüthy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Lüthy. Christoph Lüthy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Silent messengers : the circulation of material objects of knowledge in the early modern low countries | 25 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Daniel Sennert's Earliest Writings (1599/1600) and Their Debt to Giordano Bruno | 2 |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Christoph Lüthy
Christoph Lüthy is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science and Anthropology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (12 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (95 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and Anthropology (39 citations). Christoph Lüthy has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include William R. Newman, John Murdoch, Sven Dupré, Cees Leijenhorst, Hans C. Steinrücken, James Allen, Thomas Heinis, Hans Hoeken, André Lardinois and Elena‐Raluca Nicoli. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Technology and Culture and Science & Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.