Maurice Crosland
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- History of Science and Natural History 16
- History of Science and Medicine 12
- Philosophy and History of Science 8
- Historical Philosophy and Science 3
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
-
- History and advancements in chemistry 11
- Anthropology top 5%
- Historical and Literary Studies 7
-
- Historical and Scientific Studies 6
-
- History and Developments in Astronomy 4
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceTheoretical Computer SciencePhysical and Theoretical Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Maurice Crosland
51 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- History and Philosophy of Science 265
- Theoretical Computer Science 25
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 94
- Anthropology 94
- General Psychology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Maurice Crosland
This map shows the geographic impact of Maurice Crosland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maurice Crosland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maurice Crosland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maurice Crosland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maurice Crosland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maurice Crosland. The network helps show where Maurice Crosland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Maurice Crosland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 3 | In the Shadow of Lavoisier: The "Annales De Chimie" and the Establishment of a New Science | 1994 | 12 |
| 4 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 6 | Gay-Lussac, 1778-1850 : savant et bourgeois | 1991 | 0 |
| 7 | The History of Chemistry Seen in a Broader Context. | 1990 | 0 |
| 8 | Estudios historicos en el Lenguaje de la Quimica | 1988 | 3 |
| 9 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 14 | |
| 14 | The emergence of science in Western Europe | 1976 | 22 |
| 15 | 1976 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 24 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 0 | |
| 18 | The science of matter: a historical survey | 1971 | 1 |
| 19 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 20 | Historical studies in the language of chemistry | 1962 | 109 |
About Maurice Crosland
Maurice Crosland is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Medical Terminology and General Psychology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (16 papers), History of Science and Medicine (12 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (7 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (6 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (265 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (25 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (94 citations). Maurice Crosland has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Owen Hannaway, Crosbie Smith, Fritz K. Ringer and Frederick B. Artz. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physics Today and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.