William M. Goldstein

2.3k citations
19 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 14

William M. Goldstein

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William M. Goldstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • General Decision Sciences 504
  • Management Science and Operations Research 277
  • Safety Research 174
  • Applied Psychology 91
  • Marketing 122
Replace Gordon F. Pitz with:
Gordon F. Pitz United States
Kurt A. Carlson United States
Ilan Fischer Israel
William F. Wright United States
Jane Beattie United Kingdom
Eyal Ert Israel
Robyn A. LeBoeuf United States
Ofer H. Azar Israel
Charles F. Gettys United States
Greg Barron United States
William M. Goldstein relative to Gordon F. Pitz United States Gordon F. Pitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Gordon F. Pitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Goldstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Goldstein. The network helps show where William M. Goldstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside William M. Goldstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. Goldstein Line = papers co-authored together William M. Goldstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2017180
2 20106
3
Talk about tradeoffs: judgements of relative importance and contingent decision behavior
20012
4
Judgment and decision research: Some historical context.
199770
5
Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies
1997173
6 199590
7 19929
8 199214
9 199229
10 199221
11 199122
12 199115
13 199064
14 19892
15 198737
16 1987381
17 198530
18 19834
19 198373

About William M. Goldstein

William M. Goldstein is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Product Development and Customization (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (504 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (277 citations) and Safety Research (174 citations). William M. Goldstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hillel J. Einhorn, Robin M. Hogarth, Donald L. Fisher, Lene Arnett Jensen, Richard A. Shweder, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Ziv Carmon, Joel Huber, Haiyang Yang and Leaf Van Boven. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Computers & Operations Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026