William M. Goldstein

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William M. Goldstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • General Decision Sciences 504
  • Economics and Econometrics 357
  • Management Science and Operations Research 277
  • Sociology and Political Science 204
  • Artificial Intelligence 196
Replace Gordon F. Pitz with:
Gordon F. Pitz United States
Kurt A. Carlson United States
Ilan Fischer Israel
William F. Wright United States
Jane Beattie United Kingdom
Eyal Ert Israel
Robyn A. LeBoeuf United States
Ofer H. Azar Israel
Charles F. Gettys United States
Greg Barron United States
William M. Goldstein relative to Gordon F. Pitz United States Gordon F. Pitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Gordon F. Pitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Goldstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Goldstein. The network helps show where William M. Goldstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Goldstein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Goldstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Goldstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Goldstein. William M. Goldstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 180
2 6
3
Talk about tradeoffs: judgements of relative importance and contingent decision behavior
2
4
Judgment and decision research: Some historical context.
70
5
Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies
173
6 90
7 9
8 14
9 29
10 21
11 22
12 15
13 64
14 2
15 37
16 381
17 30
18 4
19 73

About William M. Goldstein

William M. Goldstein is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (504 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (277 citations) and Safety Research (174 citations). William M. Goldstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hillel J. Einhorn, Robin M. Hogarth, Donald L. Fisher, Lene Arnett Jensen, Richard A. Shweder, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Ziv Carmon, Joel Huber, Haiyang Yang and Leaf Van Boven. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Computers & Operations Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026