Wayne K. deRuiter

517 citations
21 papers · 319 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Wayne K. deRuiter

20 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Wayne K. deRuiter
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Physiology 118
  • General Health Professions 61
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
  • Clinical Psychology 39
Replace Diana Ingram with:
Diana Ingram United States
Samantha M. Gray Canada
Paola Bully Spain
Hannah Dale United Kingdom
Mark Wallace‐Bell New Zealand
Ayse Basak Cinar United Kingdom
Rebeca A. Espinoza United States
Alyssa T Brooks United States
C. Leigh Blizzard Australia
Monika Slovinec D’Angelo Canada
Wayne K. deRuiter relative to Diana Ingram United States Diana Ingram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Diana Ingram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wayne K. deRuiter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne K. deRuiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne K. deRuiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne K. deRuiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne K. deRuiter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne K. deRuiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne K. deRuiter. The network helps show where Wayne K. deRuiter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wayne K. deRuiter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wayne K. deRuiter Line = papers co-authored together Wayne K. deRuiter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200661
2 201439
3 200838
4 202027
5 201519
6 202019
7 202118
8 201517
9 200914
10 202112
11 201912
12 20209
13 20118
14 20226
15 20135
16 20134
17 20184
18 20223
19 20213
20 20241

About Wayne K. deRuiter

Wayne K. deRuiter is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (35 citations), Physiology (118 citations), General Health Professions (61 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (59 citations) and Clinical Psychology (39 citations). Wayne K. deRuiter has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guy Faulkner, John Cairney, Peter Selby, Scott T. Leatherdale, Scott Veldhuizen, Osnat C. Melamed, Laurie Zawertailo, Carolyn S. Dewa, Nadia Minian and Vicky Stergiopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Systematic Reviews, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Women s Health Issues, Nicotine & Tobacco Research and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact