Mark Wallace‐Bell

19 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Mark Wallace‐Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Physiology 184
  • Speech and Hearing 44
  • Health 44
  • General Health Professions 78
Replace Antoni Baena with:
Antoni Baena Spain
Keely Latham United States
Shiushing Wong United States
R A Walsh Australia
Melinda Pénzes Hungary
Anette Kira New Zealand
L. Roberts Ireland
Dewi Segaar Netherlands
Abigail C. Halperin United States
Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer United States
Mark Wallace‐Bell relative to Antoni Baena Spain Antoni Baena's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Antoni Baena · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wallace‐Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wallace‐Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wallace‐Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wallace‐Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wallace‐Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wallace‐Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wallace‐Bell. The network helps show where Mark Wallace‐Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mark Wallace‐Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Wallace‐Bell Line = papers co-authored together Mark Wallace‐Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
New Zealand smoking cessation guidelines.
200889
2 201049
3 201836
4 202027
5 201923
6 202115
7 201314
8
Smoking cessation: the case for hospital-based interventions.
20039
9
The effects of passive smoking on adult and child health.
20035
10 20064
11 20204
12 20223
13 20132
14 20201
15 20211
16 20221
17 20151
18 20081
19
The demographics and prevalence of youth (15-24 year olds) with type 1 diabetes in the Canterbury District Health Board catchment area in 2010: has the prevalence changed since 2003?
20121

About Mark Wallace‐Bell

Mark Wallace‐Bell is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Applied Psychology, Physiology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (10 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (54 citations), Physiology (184 citations), Speech and Hearing (44 citations), Health (44 citations) and General Health Professions (78 citations). Mark Wallace‐Bell has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Chris Bullen, Marewa Glover, Hayden McRobbie, Robyn Whittaker, Eileen Britt, Randolph C. Grace, Ann Richardson, Natalie Walker, Anthony Rodgers and Ruey‐Bin Lin. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Journal of Employment Counseling, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Partner Abuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026