Women s Health Issues

1.9k papers and 37.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Women s Health Issues in the last decades have received a total of 37.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Women s Health Issues usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (732 papers), General Health Professions (636 papers) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (392 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Health and Contraception (363 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (293 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (172 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women s Health Issues are Carol S. Weisman, Stacey B. Plichta, Elizabeth M. Yano, Sarah C. M. Roberts, Donna L. Washington, Diana Greene Foster, Marilyn Falik, Rachel K. Jones, Cynthia H. Chuang and Katy B. Kozhimannil.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Women s Health Issues

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Women s Health Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women s Health Issues.

Countries where authors publish in Women s Health Issues

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women s Health Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women s Health Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women s Health Issues more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025