W. Brian McPherson
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Phillip J. HolcombPeggy T. AckermanPhilip J. HolcombRoscoe A. DykmanJoseph E. O. NewtonJerry G. JonesR. A. DykmanPatrick H. Casey
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
W. Brian McPherson
10 papers receiving 877 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Cognitive Neuroscience 540
- Clinical Psychology 289
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 280
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 186
- Social Psychology 130
Countries citing papers authored by W. Brian McPherson
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Brian McPherson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Brian McPherson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Brian McPherson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Brian McPherson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Brian McPherson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Brian McPherson. The network helps show where W. Brian McPherson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Brian McPherson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Brian McPherson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Brian McPherson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Brian McPherson. W. Brian McPherson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 279 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 59 | |
| 7 | 287 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 191 |
About W. Brian McPherson
W. Brian McPherson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 946 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (540 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (280 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (186 citations). W. Brian McPherson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Phillip J. Holcomb, Peggy T. Ackerman, Philip J. Holcomb, Roscoe A. Dykman, Joseph E. O. Newton, Jerry G. Jones, R. A. Dykman, Patrick H. Casey and D. Michael Oglesby. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Child Abuse & Neglect and Brain and Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.