Countries where authors publish in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.
About Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
The 1.1k papers published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science in the last decades have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science usually cover General Psychology (88 papers), Social Psychology (424 papers) and Behavioral Neuroscience (47 papers) specifically the topics of Social Representations and Identity (238 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (116 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science are James P. Henry, Aaro Toomela, Timo Järvilehto, Brett Gooden, Tania Zittoun, Jana Uher, Töres Theorell, Ulf Lundberg, Svend Brinkmann and William P. Paré.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.