Daphne S. Ling
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Adele DiamondNancie Im‐BolterZohreh Yaghoub ZadehJuan Pascual‐LeoneJanice JohnsonCandice Murray
- Topics
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers)Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daphne S. Ling
5 papers receiving 774 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 371
- Cognitive Neuroscience 206
- Education 198
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
- Psychiatry and Mental health 165
Countries citing papers authored by Daphne S. Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne S. Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne S. Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne S. Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne S. Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne S. Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne S. Ling. The network helps show where Daphne S. Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daphne S. Ling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daphne S. Ling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daphne S. Ling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daphne S. Ling. Daphne S. Ling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do notbreakdown → | 725 |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 32 |
About Daphne S. Ling
Daphne S. Ling is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (371 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (18 citations). Daphne S. Ling has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adele Diamond, Nancie Im‐Bolter, Zohreh Yaghoub Zadeh, Juan Pascual‐Leone, Janice Johnson and Candice Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Cognitive Development and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.