Verena Nitsch

1.5k citations
96 papers · 740 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Verena Nitsch

80 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

Verena Nitsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Human-Computer Interaction 108
  • Social Psychology 320
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 14
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 88
  • Health Informatics 11
Replace Iina Aaltonen with:
Iina Aaltonen Finland
Sangseok You United States
Tahira Reid United States
Seul Chan Lee South Korea
Erin K. Chiou United States
Praminda Caleb-Solly United Kingdom
Linda Onnasch Germany
Yusuke Yamani United States
Angelia Sebok United States
Alexandra D. Kaplan United States
Verena Nitsch relative to Iina Aaltonen Finland Iina Aaltonen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Iina Aaltonen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Verena Nitsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Verena Nitsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Verena Nitsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Verena Nitsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Verena Nitsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Verena Nitsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Verena Nitsch. The network helps show where Verena Nitsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Verena Nitsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Verena Nitsch Line = papers co-authored together Verena Nitsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019107
2 202054
3 201937
4 202231
5 201329
6 201927
7 202022
8 201721
9 201020
10 201919
11 200918
12 202318
13 201517
14 202016
15 202214
16 202014
17 201412
18 201811
19 200811
20 201911

About Verena Nitsch

Verena Nitsch is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 96 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (21 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (12 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (12 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (10 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (8 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (108 citations), Social Psychology (320 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (14 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (88 citations) and Health Informatics (11 citations). Verena Nitsch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Mertens, Benedikt Leichtmann, Christopher Brandl, Christina Bröhl, Berthold Färber, Jochen Nelles, Freek Stulp, Martina Mara, Eckehard Steinbach and Friederike Eyssel. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, International Journal of Social Robotics, Applied Ergonomics, Biological Cybernetics and IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact