Friederike Eyssel

6.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
98 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Friederike Eyssel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Friederike Eyssel has authored 98 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Social Psychology, 28 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 27 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Friederike Eyssel's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (44 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (23 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers). Friederike Eyssel is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (44 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (23 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers). Friederike Eyssel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and New Zealand. Friederike Eyssel's co-authors include Dieta Kuchenbrandt, Frank Hegel, Gerd Bohner, Natalia Reich-Stiebert, Londa Schiebinger, James Zou, Robert P. Ellis, Cara Tannenbaum, Christoph Bartneck and Jasmin Bernotat and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Friederike Eyssel

90 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Friederike Eyssel Germany 32 2.2k 1.2k 795 768 561 98 3.6k
Elly A. Konijn Netherlands 32 1.1k 0.5× 396 0.3× 1.4k 1.7× 243 0.3× 82 0.1× 122 3.4k
Steven J. Stroessner United States 21 1.3k 0.6× 256 0.2× 1.2k 1.6× 498 0.6× 170 0.3× 40 2.5k
Ana Paiva Portugal 38 3.4k 1.6× 2.6k 2.1× 805 1.0× 858 1.1× 426 0.8× 305 5.9k
Heather M. Gray United States 19 1.4k 0.6× 338 0.3× 1.0k 1.3× 1.3k 1.7× 269 0.5× 51 3.7k
Kathy Hirsh‐Pasek United States 60 553 0.3× 546 0.4× 1.3k 1.6× 1.7k 2.3× 131 0.2× 244 12.6k
David H. Uttal United States 36 600 0.3× 276 0.2× 583 0.7× 496 0.6× 238 0.4× 144 5.9k
Robert Sparrow Australia 26 603 0.3× 378 0.3× 318 0.4× 1.1k 1.4× 822 1.5× 113 2.7k
Daniel Memmert Germany 47 2.0k 0.9× 204 0.2× 568 0.7× 1.4k 1.9× 89 0.2× 299 7.2k
James E. Young Canada 24 1.5k 0.7× 455 0.4× 690 0.9× 269 0.4× 144 0.3× 133 2.6k
Amy L. Baylor United States 29 597 0.3× 884 0.7× 378 0.5× 94 0.1× 110 0.2× 74 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Friederike Eyssel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friederike Eyssel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friederike Eyssel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friederike Eyssel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friederike Eyssel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friederike Eyssel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friederike Eyssel. The network helps show where Friederike Eyssel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friederike Eyssel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friederike Eyssel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friederike Eyssel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friederike Eyssel. Friederike Eyssel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rossi, Alessandra, et al.. (2025). Measuring transparency in intelligent robots. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 43809–43809.
2.
Eyssel, Friederike, et al.. (2024). Torn Between Love and Hate: Mouse Tracking Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 16(4). 725–741. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mayer, Axel, Friederike Eyssel, Stefan Fries, et al.. (2024). Within-subject reliability, occasion specificity, and validity of fluctuations of the Stroop and go/no-go tasks in ecological momentary assessment. Behavior Research Methods. 57(1). 29–29.
5.
Sparrow, Robert, E. van Horn, & Friederike Eyssel. (2023). Do Robots Have Sex? A Prolegomenon. International Journal of Social Robotics. 15(11). 1707–1723. 2 indexed citations
6.
Cappuccio, Massimiliano L., Jai Galliott, Friederike Eyssel, & Alessandro Lanteri. (2023). Autonomous Systems and Technology Resistance: New Tools for Monitoring Acceptance, Trust, and Tolerance. International Journal of Social Robotics. 16(6). 1–25. 4 indexed citations
7.
Eyssel, Friederike, et al.. (2022). Diversity Training With Robots: Perspective-Taking Backfires, While Sterotype-Suppression Decreases Negative Attitudes Towards Robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 9. 728923–728923. 2 indexed citations
8.
Eyssel, Friederike, et al.. (2021). Let’s not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots. PLoS ONE. 16(1). e0244697–e0244697. 18 indexed citations
9.
Tannenbaum, Cara, Robert P. Ellis, Friederike Eyssel, James Zou, & Londa Schiebinger. (2019). Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature. 575(7781). 137–146. 343 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Bernotat, Jasmin, et al.. (2016). Let the user decide! User preferences regarding functions, apps, and control modalities of a smart apartment and a service robot. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 1 indexed citations
11.
Fraune, Marlena R., et al.. (2016). Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. 980–985. 37 indexed citations
12.
Eyssel, Friederike, et al.. (2016). Mind perception: From simple shapes to social agents. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 1 indexed citations
13.
Eyssel, Friederike, et al.. (2015). Perception of artificial agents and utterance friendliness in dialogue. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 4 indexed citations
14.
Eyssel, Friederike, et al.. (2013). Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots): on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. Human-Robot Interaction. 121–122. 30 indexed citations
16.
Eyssel, Friederike & Frank Hegel. (2012). (S)he's got the look: Gender-stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 42(9). 18 indexed citations
17.
Eyssel, Friederike & Dieta Kuchenbrandt. (2011). My robot is more human than yours: Effects of group membership on anthropomorphic judgments of social robots. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 3 indexed citations
18.
Eyssel, Friederike & Frank Hegel. (2011). Of Robots and Men: Gender-Schemata of Masculine Social Robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
19.
Eyssel, Friederike, Frank Hegel, Gernot Horstmann, & Claudia Wagner. (2010). Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. 646–651. 71 indexed citations
20.
Eyssel, Friederike, Gerd Bohner, & Frank Siebler. (2006). Perceived Rape Myth Acceptance of Others Predicts Rape Proclivity: Social Norm or Judgmental Anchoring?. Swiss Journal of Psychology. 65(2). 93–99. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026