Vered Halamish

1.1k total citations
26 papers, 715 citations indexed

About

Vered Halamish is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Vered Halamish has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 715 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Vered Halamish's work include Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (7 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers). Vered Halamish is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (7 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers). Vered Halamish collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Vered Halamish's co-authors include Robert A. Bjork, Gitit Kavé, Alan D. Castel, Nira Liberman, Tami Katzir, Nicholas C. Soderstrom, Shannon McGillivray, Elizabeth Ligon Bjork, Larry L. Jacoby and Morris Goldsmith and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Computers & Education and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Vered Halamish

24 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Vered Halamish Israel 15 406 270 198 140 102 26 715
Maura Pilotti Saudi Arabia 15 368 0.9× 285 1.1× 271 1.4× 80 0.6× 204 2.0× 117 945
Elisabeth Norman Norway 17 294 0.7× 245 0.9× 195 1.0× 43 0.3× 96 0.9× 28 683
Jens F. Beckmann United Kingdom 20 166 0.4× 269 1.0× 389 2.0× 170 1.2× 167 1.6× 56 971
Franklin M. Zaromb United States 13 541 1.3× 275 1.0× 186 0.9× 188 1.3× 79 0.8× 21 844
Veronica X. Yan United States 16 279 0.7× 401 1.5× 378 1.9× 152 1.1× 187 1.8× 47 897
Paul W. Foos United States 18 324 0.8× 233 0.9× 316 1.6× 118 0.8× 129 1.3× 52 866
Michael K. Gardner United States 13 502 1.2× 273 1.0× 191 1.0× 98 0.7× 144 1.4× 34 916
David J. Radosevich United States 9 157 0.4× 198 0.7× 150 0.8× 64 0.5× 175 1.7× 13 719
Jason Geller United States 13 309 0.8× 153 0.6× 226 1.1× 56 0.4× 69 0.7× 20 828
Jerwen Jou United States 16 446 1.1× 145 0.5× 214 1.1× 75 0.5× 47 0.5× 54 692

Countries citing papers authored by Vered Halamish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vered Halamish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vered Halamish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vered Halamish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vered Halamish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vered Halamish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vered Halamish. The network helps show where Vered Halamish may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vered Halamish

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vered Halamish. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vered Halamish based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vered Halamish. Vered Halamish is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Halamish, Vered, et al.. (2025). Do immediate judgments of learning alter memory performance? A meta-analytical review.. TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt). 151(7). 892–929.
4.
Murphy, Dillon H., Vered Halamish, Matthew G. Rhodes, & Alan D. Castel. (2023). How evaluating memorability can lead to Unintended Consequences. Metacognition and Learning. 18(2). 375–403. 8 indexed citations
5.
Halamish, Vered & Monika Undorf. (2022). Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 49(4). 547–556. 17 indexed citations
6.
Halamish, Vered, et al.. (2021). Motivation-based selective encoding and retrieval. Memory & Cognition. 50(4). 736–750. 4 indexed citations
7.
Halamish, Vered & Monika Undorf. (2021). Accuracy, Causes, and Consequences of Monitoring One’s Own Learning and Memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 229(2). 87–88. 2 indexed citations
8.
Undorf, Monika & Vered Halamish. (2020). New Methods and Questions in Metamemory Research. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 228(4). 231–232. 1 indexed citations
9.
Halamish, Vered. (2018). Can very small font size enhance memory?. Memory & Cognition. 46(6). 979–993. 38 indexed citations
10.
Halamish, Vered. (2018). Pre-service and In-service Teachers’ Metacognitive Knowledge of Learning Strategies. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 2152–2152. 28 indexed citations
11.
Halamish, Vered, et al.. (2018). The Effect of Font Size on Children’s Memory and Metamemory. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1577–1577. 15 indexed citations
12.
Halamish, Vered, Leah Borovoi, & Nira Liberman. (2016). The antecedents and consequences of a beyond-choice view of decision situations: A construal level theory perspective. Acta Psychologica. 173. 41–45. 5 indexed citations
13.
Kavé, Gitit & Vered Halamish. (2015). Doubly blessed: Older adults know more vocabulary and know better what they know.. Psychology and Aging. 30(1). 68–73. 56 indexed citations
14.
Soderstrom, Nicholas C., et al.. (2014). Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(2). 553–558. 75 indexed citations
15.
Katzir, Tami, et al.. (2013). The Effect of Font Size on Reading Comprehension on Second and Fifth Grade Children: Bigger Is Not Always Better. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e74061–e74061. 48 indexed citations
16.
Cohen, Michael S., Veronica X. Yan, Vered Halamish, & Robert A. Bjork. (2013). Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(6). 1682–1696. 16 indexed citations
17.
Halamish, Vered, et al.. (2013). In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won’t: Distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(5). 1621–1627. 7 indexed citations
18.
Halamish, Vered, Shannon McGillivray, & Alan D. Castel. (2011). Monitoring one's own forgetting in younger and older adults.. Psychology and Aging. 26(3). 631–635. 58 indexed citations
19.
Halamish, Vered & Robert A. Bjork. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(4). 801–812. 142 indexed citations
20.
Halamish, Vered, Morris Goldsmith, & Larry L. Jacoby. (2011). Source-constrained recall: Front-end and back-end control of retrieval quality.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(1). 1–15. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026