Paul W. Foos

1.3k citations
52 papers · 875 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Paul W. Foos

50 papers receiving 783 citations

Peers

Paul W. Foos
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 229
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 24
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 312
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Michael K. Gardner with:
Michael K. Gardner United States
Janet E. Davidson United States
Sami̇ Gülgöz Türkiye
Douglas A. Bors Canada
Brady Butterfield United States
Karen Murphy Australia
Kalman G. Csapo Canada
Leslie J. Caplan United States
Edward Nȩcka Poland
Paula J. Waddill United States
Paul W. Foos relative to Michael K. Gardner United States Michael K. Gardner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael K. Gardner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul W. Foos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul W. Foos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul W. Foos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul W. Foos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul W. Foos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul W. Foos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul W. Foos. The network helps show where Paul W. Foos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Paul W. Foos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul W. Foos Line = papers co-authored together Paul W. Foos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199479
2 198963
3 201161
4 198955
5 198846
6 200839
7 197636
8
Publication practices and the file drawer problem: A survey of published authors.
199533
9 197531
10 199231
11 198929
12 200228
13 200526
14 200523
15 199523
16 199320
17 198020
18 198018
19 199416
20 201016

About Paul W. Foos

Paul W. Foos is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Social Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (9 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (5 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (302 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (229 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (312 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). Paul W. Foos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Cherie Clark, Paula Goolkasian, Kirk H. Smith, Ronald P. Fisher, David Boone, Lester W. Wright, Mary J. Levitt, James Rotton, Mark A. Sabol and Jo Ann Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Memory & Cognition, Journal of Educational Psychology, Experimental Aging Research, Psychology and Aging and American Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact