Michael K. Gardner

1.4k total citations
34 papers, 916 citations indexed

About

Michael K. Gardner is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael K. Gardner has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 916 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michael K. Gardner's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). Michael K. Gardner is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). Michael K. Gardner collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Michael K. Gardner's co-authors include Robert J. Sternberg, Dan J. Woltz, Brian Bell, Judith Miller, William R. Jenson, Megan Farley, Hilary Coon, William M. McMahon, Éric Fombonne and Edward Ritvo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Michael K. Gardner

33 papers receiving 837 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael K. Gardner United States 13 502 273 248 191 149 34 916
P. L. C. Van Geert Netherlands 18 258 0.5× 417 1.5× 240 1.0× 205 1.1× 90 0.6× 77 987
Sergio Escorial Spain 18 246 0.5× 154 0.6× 216 0.9× 474 2.5× 44 0.3× 52 875
R. Steve McCallum United States 18 175 0.3× 509 1.9× 151 0.6× 246 1.3× 73 0.5× 85 1.1k
Paola Bonifacci Italy 20 466 0.9× 707 2.6× 150 0.6× 111 0.6× 106 0.7× 61 1.2k
Howard C. Shane United States 21 874 1.7× 433 1.6× 398 1.6× 69 0.4× 107 0.7× 61 1.4k
Samantha Bouwmeester Netherlands 18 290 0.6× 255 0.9× 143 0.6× 281 1.5× 45 0.3× 59 947
Jo Van Herwegen United Kingdom 17 266 0.5× 322 1.2× 178 0.7× 140 0.7× 61 0.4× 88 974
David S. Kreiner United States 15 204 0.4× 298 1.1× 47 0.2× 164 0.9× 80 0.5× 65 749
Christopher A. Was United States 16 373 0.7× 320 1.2× 98 0.4× 308 1.6× 38 0.3× 56 917
Lee Anne Thompson United States 17 215 0.4× 557 2.0× 355 1.4× 650 3.4× 123 0.8× 20 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael K. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael K. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael K. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael K. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael K. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael K. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael K. Gardner. The network helps show where Michael K. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael K. Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael K. Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael K. Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael K. Gardner. Michael K. Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zheng, Robert Z., et al.. (2020). Individual differences in visuospatial working memory capacity influence the modality effect. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 37(3). 735–744. 13 indexed citations
2.
Gardner, Michael K., et al.. (2016). Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Domain Knowledge on Recall for Grocery Prices. The American Journal of Psychology. 129(2). 149–160. 1 indexed citations
3.
Woltz, Dan J. & Michael K. Gardner. (2015). Semantic priming increases word frequency judgments: Evidence for the role of memory strength in frequency estimation. Acta Psychologica. 160. 152–160. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hill, Robert D., et al.. (2013). Cognitive Strategy Use and Measured Numeric Ability in Immediate- and Long-Term Recall of Everyday Numeric Information. PLoS ONE. 8(3). e57999–e57999. 5 indexed citations
5.
Gardner, Michael K., et al.. (2013). Evaluating the Undergraduate Research Experience: A Guide for Program Directors and Principal Investigators. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations
6.
Woltz, Dan J., Michael K. Gardner, John C. Kircher, & Jason J. Burrow‐Sánchez. (2012). Relationship between perceived and actual frequency represented by common rating scale labels.. Psychological Assessment. 24(4). 995–1007. 11 indexed citations
7.
Gardner, Michael K., Robert D. Hill, & Christopher A. Was. (2011). A Procedural Approach to Remembering Personal Identification Numbers among Older Adults. PLoS ONE. 6(10). e25428–e25428. 2 indexed citations
8.
Gardner, Michael K., et al.. (2011). Demands on Users for Interpretation of Achievement Test Scores: Implications for the Evaluation Profession. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(16). 20–31.
9.
Farley, Megan, William M. McMahon, Éric Fombonne, et al.. (2009). Twenty‐year outcome for individuals with autism and average or near‐average cognitive abilities. Autism Research. 2(2). 109–118. 360 indexed citations
10.
Woltz, Dan J., Michael K. Gardner, & Brian Bell. (2000). Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: Strong-but-wrong sequence application.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 26(3). 601–625. 51 indexed citations
11.
Bell, Brian, Michael K. Gardner, & Dan J. Woltz. (1997). Individual differences in undetected errors in skilled cognitive performance. Learning and Individual Differences. 9(1). 43–61. 14 indexed citations
12.
Clark, Elaine, et al.. (1992). Components of analogical reasoning in a mildly head injured population. Current Psychology. 11(1). 21–35. 3 indexed citations
13.
Clark, Elaine, et al.. (1990). Changes in analogical reasoning in adulthood. Experimental Aging Research. 16(2). 95–99. 12 indexed citations
14.
Clark, Elaine, et al.. (1990). Effectiveness of Stimulant Drug Treatment for Attention Problems. School Psychology International. 11(3). 227–234. 9 indexed citations
15.
Gardner, Michael K., et al.. (1989). Analogical Reasoning Abilities of Recovering Alcoholics. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 13(4). 508–511. 5 indexed citations
16.
Gardner, Michael K., et al.. (1987). Does Perspective Taking Ability Contribute to Reading Comprehension. The Journal of Reading. 30(4). 7 indexed citations
17.
Gardner, Michael K., et al.. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory & Cognition. 15(1). 24–28. 57 indexed citations
18.
Gardner, Michael K.. (1985). Cognitive Psychological Approaches to Instructional Task Analysis. Review of Research in Education. 12. 157–157. 16 indexed citations
19.
Sternberg, Robert J. & Michael K. Gardner. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 112(1). 80–116. 9 indexed citations
20.
Sternberg, Robert J. & Michael K. Gardner. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 112(1). 80–116. 159 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. L. C. Van Geert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sergio Escorial Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Steve McCallum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paola Bonifacci Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Howard C. Shane Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samantha Bouwmeester Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jo Van Herwegen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David S. Kreiner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christopher A. Was Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lee Anne Thompson
Rankless by CCL
2026