Venera Gashaj

682 total citations
18 papers, 431 citations indexed

About

Venera Gashaj is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Venera Gashaj has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 431 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 11 papers in Statistics and Probability and 7 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Venera Gashaj's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (11 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (7 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers). Venera Gashaj is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (11 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (7 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers). Venera Gashaj collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Germany. Venera Gashaj's co-authors include Claudia M. Roebers, Laura C. Dapp, Fred W. Mast, Matthias Hartmann, Dragan Trninić, Manu Kapur, Morten L. Kringelbach, Anira Escrichs, Carme Uribe and Yonatan Sanz Perl and has published in prestigious journals such as Cerebral Cortex, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Venera Gashaj

17 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Venera Gashaj Switzerland 10 269 142 135 91 87 18 431
Débora Areces Spain 13 182 0.7× 128 0.9× 51 0.4× 40 0.4× 194 2.2× 54 581
Casey Irwin Helvey United States 8 275 1.0× 234 1.6× 277 2.1× 21 0.2× 66 0.8× 13 427
Roberta E. Dihoff United States 11 168 0.6× 217 1.5× 27 0.2× 24 0.3× 92 1.1× 21 458
Miriam Sarid Israel 11 126 0.5× 80 0.6× 77 0.6× 27 0.3× 42 0.5× 31 324
Peter Baggetta United States 3 87 0.3× 65 0.5× 24 0.2× 20 0.2× 97 1.1× 3 291
Amber L. Farrington United States 8 209 0.8× 242 1.7× 87 0.6× 42 0.5× 52 0.6× 8 400
Isabel Introzzi Argentina 10 72 0.3× 165 1.2× 50 0.4× 12 0.1× 130 1.5× 72 403
Marisol Cueli Spain 15 193 0.7× 169 1.2× 56 0.4× 13 0.1× 187 2.1× 60 579
Özlem Ece Demir‐Lira United States 8 195 0.7× 89 0.6× 37 0.3× 35 0.4× 99 1.1× 11 318
Rebecca Merkley Canada 12 201 0.7× 260 1.8× 261 1.9× 20 0.2× 119 1.4× 31 489

Countries citing papers authored by Venera Gashaj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Venera Gashaj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Venera Gashaj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Venera Gashaj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Venera Gashaj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Venera Gashaj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Venera Gashaj. The network helps show where Venera Gashaj may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Venera Gashaj

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Venera Gashaj. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Venera Gashaj based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Venera Gashaj. Venera Gashaj is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2024). Designing for Embodied Sense-making of Mathematics: Perspectives on Directed and Spontaneous Bodily Actions. Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 3318–3335. 3 indexed citations
2.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2024). You can count on your fingers: Finger-based intervention improves first-graders’ arithmetic learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 244. 105934–105934. 3 indexed citations
3.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2024). Bridging cognitive neuroscience and education: Insights from EEG recording during mathematical proof evaluation. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 35. 100226–100226. 2 indexed citations
4.
Trninić, Dragan, et al.. (2024). Math on cortex—enhanced delta phase synchrony in math experts during long and complex math demonstrations. Cerebral Cortex. 34(2). 2 indexed citations
5.
Cipora, Krzysztof, et al.. (2023). Cultural similarities and specificities of finger counting and montring: Evidence from Amazon Tsimane' people. Acta Psychologica. 239. 104009–104009. 3 indexed citations
6.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2023). A potential dissociation between perception and production version for bounded but not unbounded number line estimation. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 31. 100202–100202.
7.
Gashaj, Venera & Dragan Trninić. (2023). Adding up fine motor skills: Developmental relations between manual dexterity and numerical abilities. Acta Psychologica. 241. 104087–104087. 4 indexed citations
8.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2023). Foundations for future math achievement: Early numeracy, home learning environment, and the absence of math anxiety. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 33. 100217–100217. 9 indexed citations
9.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2022). Grasping Derivatives: Teaching Mathematics through Embodied Interactions using Tablets and Virtual Reality. Interaction Design and Children. 98–108. 10 indexed citations
10.
Gashaj, Venera, Laura C. Dapp, Dragan Trninić, & Claudia M. Roebers. (2021). The effect of video games, exergames and board games on executive functions in kindergarten and 2nd grade: An explorative longitudinal study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 25. 100162–100162. 30 indexed citations
11.
Uribe, Carme, Noelia Martínez‐Molina, Venera Gashaj, et al.. (2021). The Menstrual Cycle Modulates Whole-Brain Turbulent Dynamics. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 15. 753820–753820. 20 indexed citations
12.
Dapp, Laura C., Venera Gashaj, & Claudia M. Roebers. (2021). Physical activity and motor skills in children: A differentiated approach. Psychology of sport and exercise. 54. 101916–101916. 74 indexed citations
13.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2019). Individual differences in basic numerical skills: The role of executive functions and motor skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 182. 187–195. 41 indexed citations
15.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2018). The Relation Between Executive Functions, Fine Motor Skills, and Basic Numerical Skills and Their Relevance for Later Mathematics Achievement. Early Education and Development. 30(7). 913–926. 26 indexed citations
16.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2017). Motor skills in kindergarten: Internal structure, cognitive correlates and relationships to background variables. Human Movement Science. 52. 170–180. 70 indexed citations
17.
Gashaj, Venera, et al.. (2016). Numerical Magnitude Skills in 6-Years-Old Children: Exploring Specific Associations with Components of Executive Function. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology. 6(1). 157–157. 8 indexed citations
18.
Hartmann, Matthias, et al.. (2014). There is more than “more is up”: Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(4). 1401–1414. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026