Countries citing papers authored by Trevor Collins
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Trevor Collins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trevor Collins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trevor Collins more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trevor Collins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trevor Collins. The network helps show where Trevor Collins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trevor Collins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trevor Collins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trevor Collins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Trevor Collins. Trevor Collins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Warren, Paul, Paul Mulholland, Trevor Collins, & Enrico Motta. (2014). Using ontologies: understanding the user experience. Open Research Online (The Open University). 579–590.2 indexed citations
6.
d’Aquin, Mathieu, et al.. (2012). DiscOU: a flexible discovery engine for open educational resources using semantic indexing and relationship summaries. International Semantic Web Conference. 13–16.5 indexed citations
7.
Adams, Anne, Tim Coughlan, Yvonne Rogers, et al.. (2011). Live linking of fieldwork to the laboratory increases students inquiry based reflections. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
8.
Mulholland, Paul, Annika Wolff, Trevor Collins, & Zdeněk Zdráhal. (2011). An event-based approach to describing and understanding museum narratives. Open Research Online (The Open University). 1–10.4 indexed citations
9.
Davies, Sarah, et al.. (2010). Enabling remote activity: using mobile technology for remote participation in geoscience fieldwork. Open Research Online (The Open University). 10187.5 indexed citations
Scanlon, Eileen, Lucinda Kerawalla, Alison Twiner, et al.. (2010). Personal inquiry: scripting support for inquiry learning by participatory design. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
12.
Gaved, Mark, et al.. (2008). ERA: On-the-fly networking for collaborative geology fieldwork. Open Research Online (The Open University). 6(4). 23–42.4 indexed citations
Mulholland, Paul, Zdeněk Zdráhal, & Trevor Collins. (2002). CIPHER: Enabling Communities of Interest to Promote Heritage of European Regions. Open Research Online (The Open University).7 indexed citations
Collins, Trevor, Paul Mulholland, & Stuart Watt. (2001). Using genre to support active participation in learning communities. Open Research Online (The Open University).14 indexed citations
19.
Collins, Trevor. (1997). Using Software Visualisation Technology to Help Evolutionary Algorithm Users Validate Their Solutions.. 307–314.12 indexed citations
20.
Dybowski, Richard, Trevor Collins, & Peter Weller. (1996). Visualization of binary string convergence by Sammon mapping. Open Research Online (The Open University). 377–383.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.