This map shows the geographic impact of Gregory Crane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregory Crane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregory Crane more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregory Crane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregory Crane. The network helps show where Gregory Crane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gregory Crane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gregory Crane.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gregory Crane based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gregory Crane. Gregory Crane is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Celano, Giuseppe G. A., et al.. (2014). Open Philology at the University of Leipzig. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1682–1685.
5.
Monachini, Monica, et al.. (2014). The Making of Ancient Greek WordNet. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1140–1147.10 indexed citations
6.
Crane, Gregory, et al.. (2013). Active Learning for Dependency Parsing by A Committee of Parsers. 98–105.5 indexed citations
7.
Bamman, David & Gregory Crane. (2010). Corpus Linguistics, Treebanks and the Reinvention of Philology.. GI Jahrestagung (2). 542–551.2 indexed citations
8.
Crane, Gregory, et al.. (2009). Rethinking Critical Editions of Fragmentary Texts by Ontologies. International Conference on Electronic Publishing. 155–174.6 indexed citations
9.
Bamman, David, et al.. (2008). The annotation guidelines of the Latin Dependency Treebank and Index Thomisticus Treebank. The treatment of some specific syntactic constructions in Latin. Language Resources and Evaluation. 71–76.14 indexed citations
10.
Bamman, David & Gregory Crane. (2007). The Latin Dependency Treebank in a Cultural Heritage Digital Library. 33–40.17 indexed citations
11.
Crane, Gregory, et al.. (2007). Services Make the Repository. Texas Digital Library (University of Texas). 8(2). 5.11 indexed citations
12.
Crane, Gregory. (2004). Georeferencing in Historical Collections.. D-Lib Magazine. 10.7 indexed citations
13.
Crane, Gregory. (2001). Commercial digital libraries and the academic community: how new firms might develop new relationships between. D-Lib Magazine. 7(1).2 indexed citations
14.
Crane, Gregory. (1992). Perseus 1.0. Yale University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Crane, Gregory. (1992). Perseus 1.0 Manual: Interactive Sources and Studies on Ancient Greece. Yale University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Crane, Gregory. (1991). Aristotle's library: Memex as vision and hypertext as reality. ACM Conference on Hypertext. 339–352.4 indexed citations
18.
Crane, Gregory. (1988). Extending the Boundaries of Instruction and Research. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 16(2).2 indexed citations
19.
Crane, Gregory & Elli Mylonas. (1988). The Perseus project: an interactive curriculum on classical greek civilization. Educational Technology archive. 28(11). 25–32.21 indexed citations
20.
Crane, Gregory. (1987). From the Old to the New: Integrating Hypertext into Traditional Scholarship.. ACM Conference on Hypertext. 51–55.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.