Tony Ross‐Hellauer

3.1k total citations
68 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Tony Ross‐Hellauer is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Tony Ross‐Hellauer has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 25 papers in Information Systems and Management and 13 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Tony Ross‐Hellauer's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (30 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (13 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (13 papers). Tony Ross‐Hellauer is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (30 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (13 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (13 papers). Tony Ross‐Hellauer collaborates with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Tony Ross‐Hellauer's co-authors include Jonathan Tennant, Birgit Schmidt, Thomas Klebel, Nancy Pontika, Bianca Kramer, Angela Fessl, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Petr Knoth, Jessica Polka and Samantha Hindle and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Research Policy.

In The Last Decade

Tony Ross‐Hellauer

60 papers receiving 935 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tony Ross‐Hellauer Austria 13 545 427 233 124 122 68 1.0k
Marzena Świgoń Poland 18 354 0.6× 215 0.5× 217 0.9× 53 0.4× 68 0.6× 66 886
Carole J. Lee United States 9 404 0.7× 137 0.3× 94 0.4× 159 1.3× 79 0.6× 17 865
Jingfeng Xia United States 20 619 1.1× 330 0.8× 435 1.9× 40 0.3× 54 0.4× 55 1.2k
Jacqueline Leta Brazil 16 408 0.7× 141 0.3× 179 0.8× 89 0.7× 43 0.4× 57 1.0k
Turid Hedlund Finland 11 493 0.9× 262 0.6× 377 1.6× 75 0.6× 17 0.1× 30 1.1k
Jason Priem United States 10 696 1.3× 196 0.5× 533 2.3× 46 0.4× 25 0.2× 21 1.4k
Kyle Siler Canada 14 327 0.6× 168 0.4× 97 0.4× 44 0.4× 44 0.4× 26 633
Fereshteh Didegah Iran 17 776 1.4× 147 0.3× 279 1.2× 60 0.5× 16 0.1× 42 1.3k
R. Sooryamoorthy South Africa 16 373 0.7× 84 0.2× 133 0.6× 65 0.5× 16 0.1× 65 886

Countries citing papers authored by Tony Ross‐Hellauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Ross‐Hellauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Ross‐Hellauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Ross‐Hellauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tony Ross‐Hellauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Ross‐Hellauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Ross‐Hellauer. The network helps show where Tony Ross‐Hellauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tony Ross‐Hellauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tony Ross‐Hellauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tony Ross‐Hellauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tony Ross‐Hellauer. Tony Ross‐Hellauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
DeVito, Nicholas, Thomas Klebel, René Spijker, et al.. (2025). Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 12(4). 242057–242057. 4 indexed citations
2.
Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2025). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 12(3). 241248–241248. 1 indexed citations
3.
Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2025). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, et al.. (2025). Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers. AI Magazine. 46(2). 9 indexed citations
5.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony & Serge P. J. M. Horbach. (2024). Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review. Research Evaluation. 33. 5 indexed citations
6.
Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2024). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. 1 indexed citations
7.
Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2024). The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 11(6). 240286–240286. 11 indexed citations
8.
Hosseini, Mohammad, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Kristi Holmes, & Tony Ross‐Hellauer. (2024). Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities. Quantitative Science Studies. 6. 22–45. 7 indexed citations
9.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, Noémie Aubert Bonn, & Serge P. J. M. Horbach. (2024). Understanding the social and political dimensions of research(er) assessment: evaluative flexibility and hidden criteria in promotion processes at research institutes. Research Evaluation. 33. 2 indexed citations
10.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, René Spijker, Nicholas DeVito, et al.. (2024). Scoping review and evidence mapping of interventions aimed at improving reproducible and replicable science: Protocol. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 179–179. 1 indexed citations
11.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, et al.. (2023). Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers. Royal Society Open Science. 10(2). 221460–221460. 16 indexed citations
12.
Pontika, Nancy, et al.. (2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. Quantitative Science Studies. 3(4). 888–911. 33 indexed citations
13.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, et al.. (2022). Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 9(1). 211032–211032. 52 indexed citations
14.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, et al.. (2021). Dynamics of Cumulative Advantage and Threats to Equity in Open Science - A Scoping Review. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). 5 indexed citations
15.
Fecher, Benedikt, et al.. (2020). Challenges in Building Innovative, Sustainable and Open Research Infrastructures. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
16.
Mayer, Katja, et al.. (2020). Empfehlungen für eine nationale Open Science Strategie in Österreich / Recommendations for a National Open Science Strategy in Austria. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2 indexed citations
17.
Klebel, Thomas, Jessica Polka, Gary S. McDowell, et al.. (2020). Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0239518–e0239518. 41 indexed citations
18.
Tennant, Jonathan, Harry Crane, Tom Crick, et al.. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications. 7(2). 34–34. 73 indexed citations
19.
Fernandes, Pedro, Bianca Kramer, Ignasi Labastida i Juan, et al.. (2019). The Open Science Training Handbook. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5 indexed citations
20.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research. 6. 588–588. 201 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marzena Świgoń Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carole J. Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jingfeng Xia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacqueline Leta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Turid Hedlund Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason Priem Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kyle Siler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fereshteh Didegah Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Sooryamoorthy
Rankless by CCL
2026