Naomi Penfold

602 total citations
8 papers, 251 citations indexed

About

Naomi Penfold is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Physiology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi Penfold has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 251 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Information Systems and Management, 3 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Naomi Penfold's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers). Naomi Penfold is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers). Naomi Penfold collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and United States. Naomi Penfold's co-authors include Susan E. Ozanne, Jessica Polka, Catherine Aiken, Laura Dearden, Jane L. Tarry‐Adkins, John P. A. Ioannidis, Fiona Murphy, Jamie J Kirkham, David Moher and Isabelle Boutron and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The FASEB Journal and PLoS Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Naomi Penfold

7 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Naomi Penfold
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Information Systems and Management 101
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 92
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 69
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 53
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 46
Replace Sandy Goldbeck-Wood with:
Sandy Goldbeck-Wood United Kingdom
Yannick Marcon United Kingdom
Melissa Norton United States
Nan Kennedy United States
Peter Grabitz Germany
Pritpal S Tamber Germany
Jill Meinert United States
Marian A. Evans United States
Amanda Adams United States
Michael J. S. Beauvais Canada
Sandy Goldbeck-Wood United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Naomi Penfold
Naomi Penfold · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Naomi Penfold
Naomi Penfold · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Penfold

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Penfold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Penfold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Penfold more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Penfold

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Penfold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Penfold. The network helps show where Naomi Penfold may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Penfold

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Penfold. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Penfold based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Penfold. Naomi Penfold is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 49
3 41
4 33
5 3
6 0
7 69
8 49

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026