Thomas Klebel

480 total citations
18 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

Thomas Klebel is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Klebel has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 10 papers in Information Systems and Management and 8 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Thomas Klebel's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), Research Data Management Practices (8 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (7 papers). Thomas Klebel is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), Research Data Management Practices (8 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (7 papers). Thomas Klebel collaborates with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Greece. Thomas Klebel's co-authors include Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Nancy Pontika, Angela Fessl, Petr Knoth, Jessica Polka, Naomi Penfold, Gary S. McDowell, H. Metzler, Samantha Hindle and Najko Jahn and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Research Policy.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Klebel

16 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Klebel Austria	6	107	96	67	16	12	18	195
Serhii Nazarovets Ukraine	10	95 0.9×	47 0.5×	54 0.8×	15 0.9×	24 2.0×	46	252
Nancy Pontika United Kingdom	7	87 0.8×	91 0.9×	110 1.6×	21 1.3×	14 1.2×	23	246
Ray Spier United Kingdom	3	93 0.9×	57 0.6×	30 0.4×	46 2.9×	6 0.5×	7	247
В. Н. Гуреев Russia	10	159 1.5×	65 0.7×	103 1.5×	13 0.8×	9 0.8×	39	279
Monica Bradford United States	3	87 0.8×	59 0.6×	27 0.4×	34 2.1×	5 0.4×	10	195
Emilie Marcus United States	2	92 0.9×	62 0.6×	31 0.5×	36 2.3×	5 0.4×	2	192
Valentin Danchev United States	6	62 0.6×	44 0.5×	40 0.6×	54 3.4×	4 0.3×	7	208
Bekaidar Nurmashev Kazakhstan	6	77 0.7×	51 0.5×	32 0.5×	49 3.1×	6 0.5×	10	239
Toluwase Asubiaro Canada	7	82 0.8×	26 0.3×	44 0.7×	13 0.8×	8 0.7×	21	210
Stuart Lawson United Kingdom	7	130 1.2×	93 1.0×	71 1.1×	24 1.5×	9 0.8×	28	259

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Klebel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Klebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Klebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Klebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Klebel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Klebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Klebel. The network helps show where Thomas Klebel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Klebel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Klebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Klebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Klebel. Thomas Klebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

DeVito, Nicholas, Thomas Klebel, René Spijker, et al.. (2025). Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 12(4). 242057–242057. 4 indexed citations

Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2025). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 12(3). 241248–241248. 1 indexed citations

Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2025). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. 1 indexed citations

Klebel, Thomas, Federico Bianchi, Tony Ross‐Hellauer, & Flaminio Squazzoni. (2025). The paradox of competition: How funding models could undermine the uptake of data sharing practices. Research Policy. 54(10). 105340–105340.

Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2024). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. 1 indexed citations

Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2024). The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 11(6). 240286–240286. 11 indexed citations

DeVito, Nicholas, Thomas Klebel, René Spijker, et al.. (2024). Open Science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review preprint. 1 indexed citations

Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, Thomas Klebel, Petr Knoth, & Nancy Pontika. (2023). Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure. Science and Public Policy. 51(3). 337–351. 5 indexed citations

Klebel, Thomas & Tony Ross‐Hellauer. (2023). The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing. Quantitative Science Studies. 4(1). 22–43. 23 indexed citations

10.

Pontika, Nancy, et al.. (2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. Quantitative Science Studies. 3(4). 888–911. 33 indexed citations

11.

Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, et al.. (2022). Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 9(1). 211032–211032. 52 indexed citations

12.

Jahn, Najko, et al.. (2022). Quantifying the influence of Open Access on innovation and patents. Open Research Europe. 2. 64–64. 4 indexed citations

13.

Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, Thomas Klebel, Alexandra Bannach‐Brown, et al.. (2022). TIER2: enhancing Trust, Integrity and Efficiency in Research through next-level Reproducibility. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 1 indexed citations

14.

Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, et al.. (2021). Dynamics of Cumulative Advantage and Threats to Equity in Open Science - A Scoping Review. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). 5 indexed citations

15.

Klebel, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Between administration and research: Understanding data management practices in an institutional context. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(11). 1415–1431. 10 indexed citations

16.

Pontika, Nancy, Thomas Klebel, David T. Pride, et al.. (2021). ON-MERRIT D6.1 Investigating Institutional Structures of Reward & Recognition in Open Science & RRI. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2 indexed citations

17.

Klebel, Thomas, Jessica Polka, Gary S. McDowell, et al.. (2020). Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0239518–e0239518. 41 indexed citations

18.

Klebel, Thomas. (2018). jstor: Import and Analyse Data from Scientific Texts. The Journal of Open Source Software. 3(28). 883–883.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact