Samantha Hindle

788 total citations
13 papers, 388 citations indexed

About

Samantha Hindle is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Samantha Hindle has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 388 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cell Biology and 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Samantha Hindle's work include Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers). Samantha Hindle is often cited by papers focused on Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers). Samantha Hindle collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Samantha Hindle's co-authors include Roland J. Bainton, Michael K. DeSalvo, Sean T. Sweeney, Mark Eddison, Christopher Elliott, Kyle Halliwill, Sarita Hebbar, Meg Stark, C. A. Middleton and Gareth J. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature reviews. Cancer, PLoS ONE and Human Molecular Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Samantha Hindle

13 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Samantha Hindle
Nasima Mayer United States
Daniel R. Marenda United States
Shubhik DebBurman United States
Alexandra B. Byrne United States
Joseph R. Koke United States
Dawn Duke United Kingdom
Samantha Hindle
Citations per year, relative to Samantha Hindle Samantha Hindle (= 1×) peers Gabriela Casanova

Countries citing papers authored by Samantha Hindle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samantha Hindle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samantha Hindle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samantha Hindle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samantha Hindle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samantha Hindle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samantha Hindle. The network helps show where Samantha Hindle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samantha Hindle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samantha Hindle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samantha Hindle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Samantha Hindle. Samantha Hindle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Hindle, Samantha & Richard Sever. (2024). Preprints as tools to advance careers. Nature reviews. Cancer. 24(9). 591–592. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hindle, Samantha, et al.. (2021). Open Reviewers Review Assessment Rubric. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
3.
Hindle, Samantha, et al.. (2021). Open Reviewers Reviewer Guide. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2 indexed citations
4.
Klebel, Thomas, Jessica Polka, Gary S. McDowell, et al.. (2020). Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0239518–e0239518. 41 indexed citations
5.
Ross‐Hellauer, Tony, Samantha Hindle, Gary S. McDowell, et al.. (2019). Editorial policies of many highly-cited journals are hidden or unclear. Figshare. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hebbar, Sarita, Avinash Khandelwal, R. Jayashree, et al.. (2017). Lipid metabolic perturbation is an early-onset phenotype in adult spinster mutants: a Drosophila model for lysosomal storage disorders. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 28(26). 3728–3740. 18 indexed citations
7.
Hindle, Samantha, Roeben N. Munji, Elena Dolghih, et al.. (2017). Evolutionarily Conserved Roles for Blood-Brain Barrier Xenobiotic Transporters in Endogenous Steroid Partitioning and Behavior. Cell Reports. 21(5). 1304–1316. 51 indexed citations
8.
Hindle, Samantha, Sarita Hebbar, Dominik Schwudke, Christopher Elliott, & Sean T. Sweeney. (2016). A saposin deficiency model in Drosophila : Lysosomal storage, progressive neurodegeneration and sensory physiological decline. Neurobiology of Disease. 98. 77–87. 14 indexed citations
9.
DeSalvo, Michael K., et al.. (2014). The Drosophila surface glia transcriptome: evolutionary conserved blood-brain barrier processes. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 8. 346–346. 97 indexed citations
10.
Hindle, Samantha & Roland J. Bainton. (2014). Barrier mechanisms in the Drosophila blood-brain barrier. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 8. 414–414. 90 indexed citations
11.
Hindle, Samantha, Farinaz Afsari, Meg Stark, et al.. (2013). Dopaminergic expression of the Parkinsonian gene LRRK2-G2019S leads to non-autonomous visual neurodegeneration, accelerated by increased neural demands for energy. Human Molecular Genetics. 22(11). 2129–2140. 49 indexed citations
12.
Hindle, Samantha & Christopher Elliott. (2013). Spread of neuronal degeneration in a dopaminergic,Lrrk-G2019Smodel of Parkinson disease. Autophagy. 9(6). 936–938. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hindle, Samantha, Sarita Hebbar, & Sean T. Sweeney. (2011). Invertebrate models of lysosomal storage disease: what have we learned so far?. Invertebrate Neuroscience. 11(2). 59–71. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026