Bianca Kramer

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
52 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Bianca Kramer is a scholar working on Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Bianca Kramer has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Information Systems, 11 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 10 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Bianca Kramer's work include Research Data Management Practices (12 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers). Bianca Kramer is often cited by papers focused on Research Data Management Practices (12 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers). Bianca Kramer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Bianca Kramer's co-authors include Wichor M. Bramer, Dean Giustini, Joukje E. Willemsen, Rens van de Schoot, Andrew Gelman, Sarah Depaoli, Mahlet G. Tadesse, Christopher Yau, Kaspar Märtens and Marina Vannucci and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nature Neuroscience and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Bianca Kramer

47 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Bayesian statistics and modelling 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bianca Kramer Netherlands 18 299 269 259 153 140 52 1.8k
B. Ian Hutchins United States 17 310 1.0× 269 1.0× 376 1.5× 53 0.3× 103 0.7× 26 1.5k
Kimberly A. Stevens United States 20 194 0.6× 273 1.0× 779 3.0× 89 0.6× 32 0.2× 39 1.9k
Shlomo S. Sawilowsky United States 25 77 0.3× 199 0.7× 157 0.6× 109 0.7× 41 0.3× 105 4.5k
Nathalie Percie du Sert United Kingdom 12 77 0.3× 452 1.7× 194 0.7× 182 1.2× 234 1.7× 19 2.2k
Jennifer J. Ware United Kingdom 19 133 0.4× 471 1.8× 383 1.5× 186 1.2× 239 1.7× 34 3.2k
Richard B. Rosen United States 46 82 0.3× 559 2.1× 822 3.2× 168 1.1× 98 0.7× 261 6.9k
Brendan A. Maher United States 26 127 0.4× 183 0.7× 714 2.8× 53 0.3× 73 0.5× 57 3.3k
Samuel W. Greenhouse United States 21 239 0.8× 118 0.4× 302 1.2× 27 0.2× 21 0.1× 61 6.5k
Daniel Q. Naiman United States 36 313 1.0× 76 0.3× 1.6k 6.2× 47 0.3× 14 0.1× 111 6.1k
Stacey J. Winham United States 30 96 0.3× 94 0.3× 585 2.3× 25 0.2× 25 0.2× 142 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Bianca Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bianca Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bianca Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bianca Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bianca Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bianca Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bianca Kramer. The network helps show where Bianca Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bianca Kramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bianca Kramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bianca Kramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bianca Kramer. Bianca Kramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Freeman, Alexandra L. J., et al.. (2023). Knowledge Exchange Analysis Report on Alternative Publishing Platforms. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kramer, Bianca & Hans de Jonge. (2022). The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council. Quantitative Science Studies. 3(3). 583–599. 7 indexed citations
4.
Schoot, Rens van de, Jonathan De Bruin, Raoul D. Schram, et al.. (2021). An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 68 indexed citations
5.
Schoot, Rens van de, Sarah Depaoli, Ruth King, et al.. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 1(1). 616 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Neylon, Cameron, et al.. (2021). An Open Knowledge Base for the Netherlands: Report of a Community Workshop. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
7.
Schoot, Rens van de, Jonathan De Bruin, Raoul D. Schram, et al.. (2021). ASReview: Active learning for systematic reviews. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 7 indexed citations
8.
Schoot, Rens van de, et al.. (2020). Extension for COVID-19 related datasets in ASReview. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
9.
Guédon, Jean‐Claude, Michael Jubb, Bianca Kramer, et al.. (2019). Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication report of the expert group to the European Commission. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 37 indexed citations
10.
Tennant, Jonathan, Harry Crane, Tom Crick, et al.. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications. 7(2). 34–34. 73 indexed citations
11.
Fernandes, Pedro, Bianca Kramer, Ignasi Labastida i Juan, et al.. (2019). The Open Science Training Handbook. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5 indexed citations
12.
Tennant, Jonathan, Bruce Becker, Julien Colomb, et al.. (2019). What Collaboration Means to Us: We are more powerful when we work together as a community to solve problems. Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver). 11(2). 2. 2 indexed citations
13.
Pontika, Nancy, et al.. (2017). EIFL open science train-the-trainer event. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
14.
Kramer, Bianca, Jeroen Bosman, Ian Bruno, et al.. (2016). Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 1 indexed citations
15.
Kramer, Bianca & Jeroen Bosman. (2015). 101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - the Changing Research Workflow. Figshare. 17 indexed citations
16.
Bramer, Wichor M., Dean Giustini, Bianca Kramer, & Patricia F Anderson. (2013). The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2(1). 115–115. 96 indexed citations
17.
Jenks, Bruce G., et al.. (2012). The role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the regulation of cell growth and gene expression in melanotrope cells of Xenopus laevis. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 177(3). 315–321. 3 indexed citations
18.
Kolk, Sharon M., Bianca Kramer, L. Niels Cornelisse, et al.. (2002). Multiple control and dynamic response of the Xenopus melanotrope cell. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 132(1). 257–268. 33 indexed citations
19.
Kramer, Bianca, et al.. (2001). Functional organization of the suprachiasmatic nucleus of Xenopus laevis in relation to background adaptation. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 432(3). 346–355. 16 indexed citations
20.
Kramer, Bianca, C.E.E.M. van der Zee, & Theo Hagg. (1999). p75 nerve growth factor receptor is important for retrograde transport of neurotrophins in adult cholinergic basal forebrain neurons. Neuroscience. 94(4). 1163–1172. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026